Compare Arist. _de An._ Α, 2. 405 b 2 (R. P. 220) with the passages
referred to in the last note. The same suggestion is made in Zeller’s
fifth edition (p. 188, n. 1), which I had not seen when the above was
written. Döring, “Thales” (_Zschr. f. Philos._ 1896, pp. 179 sqq.),
takes the same view. We now know that, though Aristotle declines to
consider Hippon as a philosopher (_Met._ Α, 3. 984 a 3; R. P. 219 a),
he was discussed in the history of medicine known as Menon’s
_Iatrika_. See Diels in _Hermes_, xxviii. p. 420.
Now it is not very hard to see how considerations of a meteorological
kind may have led Thales to adopt the view he did. Of all the things we
know, water seems to take the most various shapes. It is familiar to us
in a solid, a liquid, and a vaporous form, and so Thales may well have
thought that he saw the world-process from water and back to water again
going on before his very eyes. The phenomenon of evaporation naturally
suggests everywhere that the fire of the heavenly bodies is kept up by
the moisture which they draw from the sea. Even at the present day, the
country people speak of the appearance of sunbeams as “the sun drawing
water.” Water comes down again in the rain; and lastly, so the early
cosmologists thought, it turns to earth. This seems strange to us, but
it may have seemed natural enough to men who were familiar with the
river of Egypt which had formed the Delta, and with the torrents of Asia
Minor, which bring down unusually large alluvial deposits. At the
present day the Gulf of Latmos, on which Miletos used to stand, is
completely filled up. Lastly, they thought, earth turns once more to
water—an idea derived from the observation of dew, night-mists, and
subterranean springs. For these last were not in early times supposed to
have anything at all to do with the rain. The “waters under the earth”
were regarded as an entirely independent source of moisture.[86]
Footnote 86:
The view here taken most resembles that of the “Homeric allegorist”
Herakleitos (R. P. 12 a). That, however, is also a conjecture,
probably of Stoic, as the others are of Peripatetic, origin.
[Sidenote: Theology.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account