11. The third of the statements mentioned above is supposed by Aristotle
himself to imply that Thales believed in a “soul of the world,” though
he is careful to mark this as no more than an inference.[87] The
doctrine of the world-soul is then attributed quite positively to Thales
by Aetios, who gives it in the Stoic phraseology which he found in his
immediate source, and identifies the world-intellect with God.[88]
Cicero found a similar account of the matter in the Epicurean manual
which he followed, but he goes a step further. Eliminating the Stoic
pantheism, he turns the world-intellect into a Platonic _demiourgos_,
and says that Thales held there was a divine mind which formed all
things out of water.[89] All this is derived from the cautious statement
of Aristotle, and can have no greater authority than its source. We need
not enter, then, upon the old controversy whether Thales was an atheist
or not. It is really irrelevant. If we may judge from his successors, he
may very possibly have called water divine; but, if he had any religious
beliefs at all, we may be sure they were quite unconnected with his
cosmological theory.
Footnote 87:
Arist. _de An._ Α, 5. 411 a 7 (R. P. 13).
Footnote 88:
Aet. i. 7, 11 = Stob. i. 56 (R. P. 14). On the sources here referred
to, see Appendix, §§ 11, 12.
Footnote 89:
Cicero, _de Nat. D._ 1. 25 (R. P. 13 b). On Cicero’s source, see
_Dox._ pp. 125, 128. The Herculanean papyrus of Philodemos is,
unfortunately, defective just at this point, but it is not likely that
the Epicurean manual anticipated Cicero’s mistake.
Nor must we make too much of the saying itself that “all things are full
of gods.” It is often supposed to mean that Thales attributed a “plastic
life” to matter, or that he was a “hylozoist.” We have seen already how
misleading this way of speaking is apt to be,[90] and we shall do well
to avoid it. It is not safe to regard such an apophthegm as evidence for
anything; the chances are that it belongs to Thales as one of the Seven
Wise Men, rather than as founder of the Milesian school. Further, such
sayings are, as a rule, anonymous to begin with, and are attributed now
to one sage and now to another.[91] On the other hand, it is extremely
probable that Thales did say that the magnet and amber had souls. That
is no apophthegm, but something more on the level of the statement that
the earth floats on the water. It is, in fact, just the sort of thing we
should expect Hekataios to record about Thales. It would be wrong,
however, to draw any inferences from it as to his view of the world; for
to say that the magnet and amber are alive is to imply, if anything,
that other things are not.[92]
Footnote 90:
See Introd. § VIII.
Footnote 91:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account