Early voyages and travels in the Levant : $b I.—The diary of Master Thomas Dallam, 1599-1600. II.—Extracts from the diaries of Dr. John Covel, 1670-1679. With some account of the Levant Company of Turkey merchants.Covel, John
History
Early voyages and travels in the Levant : $b I.—The diary of Master Thomas Dallam, 1599-1600. II.—Extracts from the diaries of Dr. John Covel, 1670-1679. With some account of the Levant Company of Turkey merchants.
Covel, John
Company of Merchants of England Trading to the Levant; English diaries; Great Britain -- Foreign relations -- Turkey; Middle East -- Description and travel; Turkey -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain
This edict has given rise to the still numerous Levantine families to
be found in the Turkish Empire, families bearing English, French, and
Italian names, and tracing their origin to those nations, but practically
absorbed in the Ottoman Empire. It was a great blow to many artisans and
merchants who had married and settled in the Levant. No less than forty
French watchmakers, who had married Greek wives and settled in Galata,
were obliged to become Turkish subjects in spite of the remonstrances of
the French ambassador, and the case of Mr. Pentloe settled the question
with regard to the English. He had married a Greek lady, and on his death
left a will appointing two English merchants as his executors, obliging
them to realise his property, and send his widow and her two children to
England. Accordingly, the executors proceeded to carry out his wishes,
but the Turkish Government seized Mrs. Pentloe and her children on
embarkation, and threw the two executors into prison, from which they
did not emerge for some considerable period; all Mr. Pentloe’s money was
confiscated, and our ambassador could get no redress. This iniquitous
_avania_ was not repealed for a hundred years afterwards, and may be
taken as the origin of most of the so-called Levantine families, great
numbers of which are to be found in Constantinople, Smyrna, Salonika, and
other trade centres in the Turkish Empire.
The progress of the Levant Company was steady, and prosperity attended
their commerce. Notwithstanding, in 1681 we find the Turkey merchants
petitioning Parliament against the East India Company, and begging for
permission to have “exercise of trade in the Red Sea, and all other
dominions of the Grand Signior, and to forbid the East India Company to
import raw or wrought silks”; and further stating that as their freights
were “raw silks, gaules, grograms, yarn, cotton, etc., and as they, not
being a joint-stock Company, did not export much gold”, that the East
India Company ought to be restricted from importing such things as they
considered they only had the monopoly of. To this petition the East India
Company drew up an exhaustive reply, and Parliament set the petition on
one side.
For the first three decades of the last century the prosperity of the
Levant Company may be said to have been at its height. In the years
1716 and 1717 they exported to Turkey “43,000 cloths, and a very great
quantity of lead, tin, sugar, etc.” In 1718, for the greater protection
of merchants, “general ships”, which sailed together in large squadrons,
were appointed, and the manufacturers had nothing to do but to convey
their goods to the wharves, consign them to the shipowners, and pay the
freight. These general ships, as they were called, used to leave England
about July 1st, so as to have good weather in the open seas, and reach
Turkey about the right time for the winter markets; then they returned
home with raw silks, mohair, and other products of the East.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account