Early Voyages to Terra Australis, Now Called Australia:: A Collection of Documents, and Extracts from Early Manuscript Maps, Illustrative of the History of Discovery on the Coasts of That Vast Island, from the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century to the Time of Captain Cook.Major, Richard Henry
History
Early Voyages to Terra Australis, Now Called Australia:: A Collection of Documents, and Extracts from Early Manuscript Maps, Illustrative of the History of Discovery on the Coasts of That Vast Island, from the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century to the Time of Captain Cook.
Major, Richard Henry
Australia -- Discovery and exploration; Discoveries in geography -- Portuguese; Voyages and travels
his own original chart, is the next to be desired: viz., an early copy,
perhaps from his own chart, with the tracks of his two voyages pricked
thereon, and the entire soundings of the voyage of 1644 laid down. A
reduction of this chart is here given. It forms Art. 12 in a
miscellaneous MS. collection marked 5222 in the department of MSS. in
the British Museum. It bears no name or date, but is written on exactly
the same kind of paper, with the same ink, and by the same hand, as one
by Captain Thomas Bowrey, in the same volume, done at Fort St. George in
1687. It is observable, that in the preface to a work by Captain Bowrey,
on the Malay language, he says, that in 1688, he embarked at Fort St.
George, as a passenger for England, having been nineteen years in the
East Indies, continually engaged in navigation and trading in those
countries, in Sumatra, Borneo, Bantam, and Java. The twofold blunder,
both as to fact and date, contained in the sentence inserted in the
middle of the chart, “This large land of New Guinea was first discovered
_to joyne to y^e south land_ by y^e Yot Lemmen as by this chart Francois
Jacobus Vis. Pilot Major Anno 1643” is self-evidently an independent
subsequent insertion, probably by Bowrey himself, and therefore by no
means impugns the inference that the chart is otherwise a genuine copy.
The soundings verify the track, and show that Tasman regarded the first
point of his instructions as to the exploration of the “great inlet,”
either as of less importance or of greater danger than the subsequent
portion, as to establishing the continuity of the lands on the north and
north-west coasts of “the great known southern continent.”
[Illustration: Tasman’s Track]
It is worthy of remark, that the map by Klencke, already referred to,
leaves the passage towards Torres Strait open, while in the map here
given it is closed. The missing narrative of Tasman alone could explain
this discrepancy, or show us the amount of authenticity to be ascribed
to either of these maps; but it appears to the editor, that the track
laid down with the soundings, gives to the map here given the claim to
preference, while the very depth of the imaginary bight here drawn,
instead of the strait, throws it out of the line of exploration in the
voyage whose track is described. From the notes of the Burgomaster
Witsen (1705), we derive the only fragment of an account of this most
important voyage. From thence we gain the earliest information
respecting the inhabitants. The translation is given by Dalrymple, in
his volume on _Papua_. It is as follows: “In latitude 13 degrees, 8
minutes south, longitude 146 degrees, 18 minutes (probably about 129½
degrees east of Greenwich), the coast is barren. The people are bad and
wicked, shooting at the Dutch with arrows, without provocation, when
they were coming on shore. It is here very populous.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account