Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
Leaving this plot with its mysteries, falsehoods, and alarms, and
turning once more to the proceedings of Parliament, we find that the
sixteenth session opened on the 21st of October, just at the crisis
when the storm raised by Oates had reached its height. The King’s
speech touched lightly on the subject. Lord Chancellor Finch noticed
it with guarded phraseology, but the House of Commons at once resolved
upon an address for removing Popish recusants from the Metropolis,
and having appointed a Committee to inquire into Godfrey’s murder,
they also agreed with the Lords to request His Majesty to proclaim a
national fast.
In 1673 an Act had been passed excluding Roman Catholics from all
places of profit and trust; now a Bill was introduced to exclude
them from Parliament and from the Councils of the Sovereign.[11] By
help of the existing panic, the Bill made its way with ease; and
what is remarkable, in this measure the obligation to receive the
sacrament is not mentioned--an omission doubtless intended for the
benefit of Dissenters, whose sympathy and assistance were just then
valued by persons who had been accustomed before to treat them with
violence--but a strong declaration to the effect that Romish worship
is idolatrous was imposed, together with the Oaths of Allegiance and
Supremacy. When this Bill reached the House of Lords, Gunning, Bishop
of Ely, objected to the description and treatment of Romish worship
as idolatrous; yet his arguments on this point being met by Barlow,
Bishop of Lincoln, Gunning--although he said he could not himself adopt
the new declaration--after it became law, followed the example of his
brethren.[12]
[Sidenote: PARLIAMENT.]
The Lords looked with little favour upon a Bill which, by disqualifying
Papists from sitting in Parliament, would deprive some of their own
order of hereditary rights; notwithstanding goaded by the Commons, and
encouraged by the King, they at last without opposition passed the
measure, providing in it an exception on behalf of the Duke of York.
This exception displeased the Commons, who, above all things, desired
to remove a Roman Catholic prince from the government of the country;
and, therefore, when the Bill returned to them with its amendments, it
had to meet the most strenuous opposition from the Country party. High
words were followed not only, as in the Long Parliament, by storms of
outcries and by menaces of violence, but by actual blows; and after
a singularly angry debate, the proviso passed only by a majority of
two, and the Royal assent was given to the whole Bill with very great
reluctance.[13]
CHAPTER II.
[Sidenote: PROTESTANT OPPOSITION.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account