Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
The fall of the Earl of Danby is to be attributed to an artful
contrivance by the French Court; which, from revenge against him for
his real enmity, accomplished his ruin, by pretending that he was a
friend. By means of Montague--who laid before the House of Commons
despatches, written to him by the Minister, most unwillingly, but at
the King’s command--Louis XIV. established against Danby, charges
of intrigues with France for obtaining money, quite sufficient to
extinguish for ever all the credit which he had ever had with his own
countrymen. His plea of unwillingness to enter into his master’s policy
with regard to France, although true, proved inadequate to save him
from impeachment by the Commons, who acted upon the constitutional
principle--that the King’s Ministers are responsible for what they
perform in the King’s name. Danby, though made a victim of revenge,
and in truth, suffering “not on account of his delinquency, but on
account of his merits,” had put himself in such a false position, that
Parliament could do no otherwise than demand his removal from office.
How far the extreme step of impeachment can be justified is another
question; and, at all events, the charge of his being Popishly affected
is truly absurd. The accusation of his concealing the Popish plot,
of suppressing the evidence, and of discountenancing the witnesses,
could not be made even plausible, for though he had been sceptical at
first respecting the story told by Oates, as any sensible man might
well be, he had afterwards fully committed himself to the proceedings
against the accused Papists; yet perhaps there is some truth in an
amusing passage written by one who cherished strong prejudices against
him:--“The Earl of Danby thought he could serve himself of this plot
of Oates, and accordingly endeavoured at it; but it is plain that he
had no command of the engine, and instead of his sharing the popularity
of nursing it, he found himself so intrigued that it was like a wolf
by the ears: he could neither hold it nor let it go, and for certain
it bit him at last, just as when a barbarous mastiff attacks a man, he
cries ‘poor cur,’ and is pulled down at last.”[14]
The resolution of the Commons on the 19th of December, 1678, to impeach
the Lord Treasurer, was followed by a prorogation on the 30th, and a
dissolution on the 24th of January, 1679; this Parliament having then
sat for the long space of eighteen years.
[Sidenote: 1679.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account