Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2] — John Shaqi
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]Stoughton, John
History
Ecclesiastical History of England, Volume 4—The Church of the Restoration [part 2]
Stoughton, John
Great Britain -- Church history
After the impeachment and imprisonment of the Earl of Danby, in spite
of Royal endeavours to screen him, His Majesty being then left without
an adviser, sent for Sir William Temple, and appointed him Secretary
of State, in the room of Coventry. This ingenious politician proposed,
that there should be a Council, consisting of thirty members, fifteen
of them to be Officers of State, chosen by the King; the other
fifteen, popular leaders of the two Houses. The idea was, to blend
the Government and the Opposition together, or, rather, to prevent
the existence of any opposition at all.[24] The Council of statesmen
formed on this model included, on the one hand, Essex, Sunderland,
and Halifax--men attached to Court interests, in favour with the
King, and suspected by the people; and on the other hand, the Earl
of Shaftesbury, a leading spirit of the old Cabal, now an extreme
opponent of the Court policy, and Lord William Russell, an eminently
zealous Protestant, and popular Member of the House of Commons. The
last two names are interwoven from the beginning, with the popular plan
for setting aside the Duke of York--the first three Ministers being
entirely opposed to it, and advocating the legitimate succession, with
certain safeguards for the protection of Protestantism. This division
of opinion in the Council reflected and magnified itself in the
divisions of Parliament.
[Sidenote: 1679.]
Parliament met in March. The King and such Ministers as agreed with
him, proposed terms of compromise in reference to the succession.
The Chancellor, in April, stated that His Majesty was willing to
distinguish a Popish from a Protestant successor; and so to limit the
authority of the latter in reference to the Church, that all benefices
in the gift of the Crown should be conferred in such a manner as to
ensure the appointment of pious and learned Protestants.[25] Other
restrictions of a political kind were proposed, which, as Charles said,
would “pare the nails” of a Popish King.
The Exclusion Bill was carried by the Commons in the month of May, but
the effect was neutralized by a sudden prorogation of Parliament before
the month had expired.[26] Parliament being dissolved by proclamation
on the 12th of July, a new one was called for the following October.
[Sidenote: DANGERFIELD’S PLOT.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account