Editorials from the Hearst NewspapersBrisbane, Arthur
Philosophy
Editorials from the Hearst Newspapers
Brisbane, Arthur
Editorials; Essays
Science, which gradually finds things out, denying as it goes
along everything one step beyond, tells you truly that the
clusters of atoms in iron float in a sea of ether, just as do our
planets going round the sun. Heat the iron intensely. What
happens? You get what you call white heat. The white heat and
the white light come from the increase of wave motion in this
ether, and this ether, absolutely imponderable, of a tenuity
inconceivable, possesses elasticity greater and more powerful
than that of coiled steel. ----
So much for one small piece of iron, such as you would kick to
one side in a junk heap. If it interests you, read pages 159 to
162 of John Fiske's admirable little book, "Through Nature to
God." You will finish the book the day you get it.
If you are surprised to learn how much you did not know about
iron--after living near bits of iron all your life--is it not
just possible that your mind may be too feeble to conceive of
God?
For the fly buzzing about the edge of Niagara Falls, the falls do
not exist. The fly's brain cannot grasp their grandeur. It can
understand only the speck of spray that falls on its wing.
You live with God around you, hopelessly incapable of perceiving
His existence save through that faint spark of unconscious faith
that was mercifully planted in you. Snuff that out with dull
efforts at reason, and you have nothing.
WE LONG FOR IMMORTAL IMPERFECTION-- WE CAN'T HAVE IT.
All our longings for immortality, all our plans for immortal life
are based on the hope that Divine Providence will condescend to
let us live in another world as we live here.
Each of us wants to be himself in the future life, and to see his
friends as he knew them.
We want to preserve individuality forever and ever, when the
stars shall have faded away and the days of matter ended.
But what is individuality except imperfection? You are different
from Smith, Smith is different from Jones. But it is simply a
difference of imperfect construction. One is more foolish than
another, one is more irresponsibly moved to laughter or
anger--that constitutes his personality.
Remove our imperfections and we should all be alike--smooth off
all agglomerations of matter on all sides and everything would be
spherical.
What would be the use of keeping so many of us if we were all
perfect, and therefore all alike? One talks through his nose,
one has a deep voice. But shall kind Providence provide two sets
of wings for nose talkers and chest talkers? Why not make the
two into one good talker and save one pair of wings?
Why not, in fact, keep just one perfect sample, and let all the
rest placidly drift back to nothingness? Or, better, why not
take all the goodness that there is in all the men and women that
ever were and melt it all down into one cosmic human being? ----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account