Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal InstitutionPetrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
History
Egyptian decorative art : $b A course of lectures delivered at the Royal Institution
Petrie, W. M. Flinders (William Matthew Flinders)
Decoration and ornament -- Egypt
The debated question of lotus and papyrus disappears at once when we
look at the feathery head of minute flowers which the papyrus bears.
That some flower, such as a _nelumbium_, was confused with the lotus
seems, however, very likely. There is no doubt that in ornament
different flowers were sometimes confused, and their details mixed;
hence it is of no use for us to be too particular in trying to separate
them. We shall therefore use the name lotus in general without
necessarily entering on botanical reasons for and against it on each
occasion.
[Illustration: 112.—L.D. II. 33; I. 27.]
[Illustration: 113.—L.D. III. 68. XVIIIth dyn.]
The oldest use of the lotus was in groups of two flowers tied together
by the stalks; such are found on the prehistoric pottery at Koptos, and
on the earliest tombs. But in later times this became corrupted, and the
origin apparently forgotten, by the XVIIIth dynasty.
[Illustration: Fig. 114.]
[Illustration: 115.—L.D. II. 52. P. 74.]
[Illustration: Fig. 116.]
[Illustration: 117.—P. 79.]
[Illustration: 118.—P. 21. L.D. III. 76.]
The plain flower was also used very early, as we see on the head-band of
Nefert at the beginning of the IVth dynasty. And as architectural
ornament it appears as a capital in wood of the Vth dynasty in the tomb
of Imery. At Karnak there is a celebrated pair of granite pillars, one
with the papyrus, the other with the lotus; and this form, with the
sepals turned over at the end, became the more usual in the Empire and
later times.
The variety of lotus capital is very great. The bud capital and the
opened flower are both shown in the XVIIIth dynasty (tomb of Khaemhat);
and many composite, complicated, and impossible combinations were piled
together in the decadent age of the Ramessides.
[Illustration: 119.—P. Mon. L.]
[Illustration: 120.—R.C. lviii.]
[Illustration: 121.—P. 88.]
[Illustration: 122.—R.C. lxx.]
The lotus was also much used in repetition as a border pattern, but not
apparently before the XVIIIth dynasty; and usually it is in alternation
with buds, which fit harmoniously into the curves between the flowers.
This line of flowers and buds was varied as flowers and grapes, and
appears very often in the XVIIIth dynasty.
The flower and bud was further developed in a mechanical fashion, and we
can trace a continuous series of forms beginning in a flower and bud
pattern and modifying the intermediate member, until on reversing the
line we find that something has been evolved which is indistinguishable
from the Greek palmetto alternating with the lotus. The isolated
anthemion, which is so much like this, has probably a different origin,
as we shall soon see.
[Illustration: 123.—P. 89. 8.]
[Illustration: Fig. 124. 89. 9. 90. 4.]
[Illustration: Fig. 125. 90. 5. 90. 6.]
[Illustration: 126.—P. 90. 5.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account