Of the sources of electricity we have mentioned two: Friction, and
Galvanism or chemical action. There are hundreds of forms of the latter
species of apparatus for generating electrical energy, so we will
mention only a few of the more prominent ones. It is not our intention
to go into the chemistry of batteries. There are too many exhaustive
works on this subject lying on the shelves of libraries that are
accessible to all. All galvanic batteries act on one general
principle--the generation of electricity by the chemical action of acid
on metal plates; but the chemistry of their action is very different. In
all batteries the potential energy of one element is greater than the
other. The acid of the battery dissolves the element of greater
potentiality, and its energy is freed and under right conditions takes
on the form of electricity. The potential of zinc, for instance, is
greater than that of copper, and the measure of the difference is called
the "electromotive force," the unit of which is the "volt."
Electromotive force is another name for pressure; the symbol for which
is _E.M.F._
If we were to put two zinc plates in the battery fluid and connect them
in the ordinary way there would be no electricity evolved (assuming that
they were perfectly homogeneous), because they are both of the same
potential, or have the same possible amount of stored electrical energy
measured by its working power. If one of the zinc plates were softer
than the other, a feeble current would be developed, for one would be
more readily acted upon by the acids than the other. The battery that
has been most used in America for telegraphic purposes is called the
gravity-battery. It is constructed by putting a copper plate in some
form at the bottom of a jar, usually of glass, and filling it partly
full of the crystals of sulphate of copper, commonly called "bluestone."
Zinc, usually cast in some open form, so as to expose a large surface to
the solution, is suspended in the upper part of the jar, which is then
filled with water till it covers the zinc. The zinc is the positive
metal, but it is called the negative pole. The energy developed by the
zinc passes from zinc to copper and out on the circuit from the copper
pole. Hence the copper came to be called the positive pole, although in
relation to zinc it is negative. Copper would, however, be positive to
some other metal whose potential was less. So you see that metals are
relative, not absolute, in their character as positive and negative
elements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account