Emerson on Sound Money: A Speech, 1896Emerson, Willis George
History
Emerson on Sound Money: A Speech, 1896
Emerson, Willis George
Currency question -- United States; Silver question
My friends, I believe, and believe most earnestly, with every throb of
my heart, that in the present campaign the Republican party is the
only true friend silver has. We seek to elevate the silver dollar,
our opponents seek to debase it. The Republican party has provided a
redeemer for every silver dollar. Our opponents seek to destroy and
alienate this redeemer. If the silver dollar was not exchangeable with
gold, it would not be worth any more than a Mexican dollar, or not as
much, for there is less silver in it. Coin's Financial School and free
silver advocates generally, have much to say about the money of the
constitution. Let me say to you, the money of the constitution was based
upon the relative market value of the two metals. The history of the
last 404 years, from 1492 to 1896, is replete with evidence proving
beyond the question of a doubt that the relative or market value of
these metals is continually changing. When Columbus discovered America
in 1492, ten ounces of silver would purchase one ounce of gold; when the
Pilgrim Fathers landed on the rocky and barren coast of New England in
1620, thirteen ounces of silver would purchase one ounce of gold; in
1792 fifteen ounces of silver would purchase one ounce of gold. In 1873
one ounce of gold would not purchase sixteen ounces of silver. To-day
one ounce of gold will purchase almost thirty-two ounces of silver.
THIS FLUCTUATION OF VALUES OF THE TWO METALS IS CONTROLLED, NOT BY LAWS
WE SPREAD UPON OUR STATUTE BOOKS, BUT BY THE LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND,
GOVERNED BY THE COST OF PRODUCTION.
JACKSON AND JEFFERSON.
The patriotism and statesmanship of Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson
were untainted in 1792 by the dangerous influence of a coterie of silver
barons. They simply ascertained as nearly as they could the relative
or market value of the two metals, and determined the legal from the
commercial ratio, placed them side by side and started our mints going
with the unlimited coinage of gold and silver at the ratio of 15 to 1.
As a matter of fact they had overvalued silver; that is to say, the
gold dollar was worth 100 cents, but the silver dollar was only worth 98
cents. Now the rank and file of our forefathers cared very little about
the discrepancy of the 2 cents on the dollars, but the money changers
were abroad in the land in 1792, the same as they are in 1896, and
whenever a gold coin came into their possession it was quietly retired
from circulation. In other words, the cheaper money drove out of
circulation the higher priced money, and as a result, we had silver as
the only hard money currency circulating in this country from 1792 to
1834. Let me quote Thomas Jefferson's own words. In speaking of the
ratio of the two metals, he says:
"THE PROPORTION BETWEEN THE VALUES OF GOLD AND SILVER IS A MERCANTILE
PROBLEM ALTOGETHER."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account