_Charge on Ion._--By this method we can determine the number of ions
per unit volume of an ionized gas. Knowing this number we can proceed
to determine the charge on an ion. To do this let us apply an electric
force so as to send a current of electricity through the gas, taking
care that the current is only a small fraction of the saturating
current. Then if u is the sum of the velocities of the positive and
negative ions produced in the electric field applied to the gas, the
current through unit area of the gas is neu, where n is the number of
positive or negative ions per cubic centimetre, and e the charge on an
ion. We can easily measure the current through the gas and thus
determine neu; we can determine n by the method just described, and u,
the velocity of the ions under the given electric field, is known from
the experiments of Zeleny and others. Thus since the product neu, and
two of the factors n, u are known, we can determine the other factor
e, the charge on the ion. This method was used by J. J. Thomson, and
details of the method will be found in _Phil. Mag._ [5], 46, p. 528;
[5], 48, p. 547; [6], 5, p. 346. The result of these measurements
shows that the charge on the ion is the same whether the ionization is
by Röntgen rays or by the influence of ultra-violet light on a metal
plate. It is the same whether the gas ionized is hydrogen, air or
carbonic acid, and thus is presumably independent of the nature of the
gas. The value of e formed by this method was 3.4 × 10^-10
electrostatic units.
H. A. Wilson (_Phil. Mag._ [6], 5, p. 429) used another method. Drops
of water, as we have seen, condense more easily on negative than on
positive ions. It is possible, therefore, to adjust the expansion so
that a cloud is formed on the negative but not on the positive ions.
Wilson arranged the experiments so that such a cloud was formed
between two horizontal plates which could be maintained at different
potentials. The charged drops between the plates were acted upon by a
uniform vertical force which affected their rate of fall. Let X be the
vertical electric force, e the charge on the drop, v1 the rate of fall
of the drop when this force acts, and v the rate of fall due to
gravity alone. Then since the rate of fall is proportionate to the
force on the drop, if a is the radius of the drop, and [rho] its
density, then
Xe + (4/3)[pi][rho]ga³ v1
---------------------- = ---,
4/3[pi][rho]ga³ v
or Xe = (4/3)[pi][rho]ga³(v1 - v)/v.
But v = 2/9ga²[rho]/[mu],
so that
/ / [mu]³ v^(3/2)(v1 - v)
Xe = \/ 2.9[pi] - / ------ · ---------------.
\/ g[rho] v
Thus if X, v, v1 are known e can be determined. Wilson by this method
found that e was 3.1 × 10^-10 electrostatic units. A few of the ions
carried charges 2e or 3e.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account