A simple cubic equation
was presented in the problem of finding two mean proportionals, x, y,
between two lines, one double the other. We have a:x = x:y = y:2a, which
gives x^2 = ay and xy = 2a^2; eliminating y we obtain x^3 = 2a^3, a
simple cubic. The Greeks could not solve this equation, which also arose
in the problems of duplicating a cube and trisecting an angle, by the
ruler and compasses, but only by mechanical curves such as the cissoid,
conchoid and quadratrix. Such solutions were much improved by the Arabs,
who also solved both cubics and biquadratics by means of intersecting
conics; at the same time, they developed methods, originated by
Diophantus and improved by the Hindus, for finding approximate roots of
numerical equations by algebraic processes. The algebraic solution of
the general cubic and biquadratic was effected in the 16th century by S.
Ferro, N. Tartaglia, H. Cardan and L. Ferrari (see ALGEBRA: _History_).
Many fruitless attempts were made to solve algebraically the quintic
equation until P. Ruffini and N.H. Abel proved the problem to be
impossible; a solution involving elliptic functions has been given by C.
Hermite and L. Kronecker, while F. Klein has given another solution.
In the geometric treatment of equations the Greeks and Arabs based their
constructions upon certain empirically deduced properties of the curves
and figures employed. Knowing various metrical relations, generally
expressed as proportions, it was found possible to solve particular
equations, but a general method was wanting. This lacuna was not filled
until the 17th century, when Descartes discovered the general theory
which explained the nature of such solutions, in particular those
wherein conics were employed, and, in addition, established the most
important facts that every equation represents a geometrical locus, and
conversely. To represent equations containing two unknowns, x, y, he
chose two axes of reference mutually perpendicular, and measured x along
the horizontal axis and y along the vertical. Then by the methods
described in the article GEOMETRY: _Analytical_, he showed that--(1) a
linear equation represents a straight line, and (2) a quadratic
represents a conic. If the equation be homogeneous or break up into
factors, it represents a number of straight lines in the first case, and
the loci corresponding to the factors in the second. The solution of
simultaneous equations is easily seen to be the values of x, y
corresponding to the intersections of the loci. It follows that there is
only one value of x, y which satisfies two linear equations, since two
lines intersect in one point only; two values which satisfy a linear and
quadratic, since a line intersects a conic in two points; and four
values which satisfy two quadratics, since two conics intersect in four
points. It may happen that the curves do not actually intersect in the
theoretical maximum number of points; the principle of continuity (see
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account