If now the instrument, perfectly levelled, is adjusted to have its
centre wire on one of the marks, then when elevated to the star, the
star will traverse the wire, and its exact position in the field at
any moment can be measured by the micrometer wire. Alternate
observations of the star and the terrestrial mark, combined with
careful level readings and reversals of the instrument, will enable
one, even with only one mark, to determine the direction of the
meridian in the course of an hour with a probable error of less than a
second. The second mark enables one to complete the station more
rapidly and gives a check upon the work. As an instance, at Findlay
Seat, in latitude 57 deg. 35', the resulting azimuths of the two marks
were 177 deg. 45' 37".29 [+-] 0".20 and 182 deg. 17' 15".61 [+-] 0".13,
while the angle between the two marks directly measured by a
theodolite was found to be 4 deg. 31' 37".43 [+-] 0".23.
[Illustration: FIG. 3.]
We now come to the consideration of the determination of time with the
transit instrument. Let fig. 3 represent the sphere stereographically
projected on the plane of the horizon,--ns being the meridian, we the
prime vertical, Z, P the zenith and the pole. Let p be the point in
which the production of the axis of the instrument meets the celestial
sphere, S the position of a star when observed on a wire whose
distance from the collimation centre is c. Let a be the azimuthal
deviation, namely, the angle wZp, b the level error so that Zp = 90
deg. - b. Let also the hour angle corresponding to p be 90 deg. - n,
and the declination of the same = m, the star's declination being
[delta], and the latitude [phi]. Then to find the hour angle ZPS =
[tau] of the star when observed, in the triangles pPS, pPZ we have,
since pPS = 90 + [tau] - n,
-Sin c = sin m sin [delta] + cos m cos [delta] sin (n - [tau]),
Sin m = sin b sin [phi] - cos b cos [phi] sin a,
Cos m sin n = sin b cos [phi] + cos b sin [phi] sin a.
And these equations solve the problem, however large be the errors of
the instrument. Supposing, as usual, a, b, m, n to be small, we have
at once [tau] = n + c sec [delta] + m tan [delta], which is the
correction to the observed time of transit. Or, eliminating m and n by
means of the second and third equations, and putting z for the zenith
distance of the star, t for the observed time of transit, the
corrected time is t + (a sin z + b cos z + c) / cos [delta]. Another
very convenient form for stars near the zenith is [tau] = b sec [phi]
+ c sec [delta] + m (tan [delta] - tan [phi]).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account