labour, and thus necessarily carry on their cultivation by means of
hired servants" (H. H. Risley, _Census Report_).
The scale of social precedence as recognized by native public opinion
is concisely reviewed (ib.) as revealing itself "in the facts that
particular castes are supposed to be modern representatives of one or
other of the original castes of the theoretical Hindu system; that
Brahmans will take water from certain castes; that Brahmans of high
standing will serve particular castes; that certain castes, though not
served by the best Brahmans, have nevertheless got Brahmans of their
own whose rank varies according to circumstances; that certain castes
are not served by Brahmans at all but have priests of their own; that
the status of certain castes has been raised by their taking to
infant-marriage or abandoning the re-marriage of widows; that the
status of others has been modified by their pursuing some occupations
in a special or peculiar way; that some can claim the services of the
village barber, the village palanquin-bearer, the village midwife,
&c., while others cannot; that some castes may not enter the
courtyards of certain temples; that some castes are subject to special
taboos, such as that they must not use the village well, or may draw
water only with their own vessels, that they must live outside the
village or in a separate quarter, that they must leave the road on the
approach of a high-caste man and must call out to give warning of
their approach." ... "The first point to observe is the predominance
throughout India of the influence of the traditional system of four
original castes. In every scheme of grouping the Brahman heads the
list. Then come the castes whom popular opinion accepts as the modern
representatives of the Kshatriyas; and these are followed by the
mercantile groups supposed to be akin to the Vaisyas. When we leave
the higher circles of the twice-born, the difficulty of finding a
uniform basis of classification becomes apparent. The ancient
designation Sudra finds no great favour in modern times, and we can
point to no group that is generally recognized as representing it. The
term is used in Bombay, Madras and Bengal to denote a considerable
number of castes of moderate respectability, the higher of whom are
considered 'clean' Sudras, while the precise status of the lower is a
question which lends itself to endless controversy." ... In northern
and north-western India, on the other hand, "the grade next below the
twice-born rank is occupied by a number of castes from whose hands
Brahmans and members of the higher castes will take water and certain
kinds of sweetmeats. Below these again is rather an indeterminate
group from whom water is taken by some of the higher castes, not by
others. Further down, where the test of water no longer applies, the
status of the caste depends on the nature of its occupation and its
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account