habits in respect of diet. There are castes whose touch defiles the
twice-born, but who do not commit the crowning enormity of eating
beef.... In western and southern India the idea that the social state
of a caste depends on whether Brahmans will take water and sweetmeats
from its members is unknown, for the higher castes will as a rule take
water only from persons of their own caste and sub-caste. In Madras
especially the idea of ceremonial pollution by the proximity of an
unclean caste has been developed with much elaboration. Thus the table
of social precedence attached to the Cochin report shows that while a
Nayar can pollute a man of a higher caste only by touching him, people
of the Kammalan group, including masons, blacksmiths, carpenters and
workers in leather, pollute at a distance of 24 ft., toddy-drawers at
36 ft., Pulayan or Cheruman cultivators at 48 ft., while in the case
of the Paraiyan (Pariahs) who eat beef the range of pollution is no
less than 64 ft."
In this bewildering maze of social grades and class distinctions, the
Brahman, as will have been seen, continues to hold the dominant
position, being respected and even worshipped by all the others. "The
more orthodox Sudras carry their veneration for the priestly class to
such a degree that they will not cross the shadow of a Brahman, and it
is not unusual for them to be under a vow not to eat any food in the
morning, before drinking _Bipracharanamrita_, i.e. water in which the
toe of a Brahman has been dipped. On the other hand, the pride of the
Brahmans is such that they do not bow to even the images of the gods
worshipped in a Sudra's house by Brahman priests" (Jog. Nath Bh.). There
are, however, not a few classes of Brahmans who, for various reasons,
have become degraded from their high station, and formed separate castes
with whom respectable Brahmans refuse to intermarry and consort. Chief
amongst these are the Brahmans who minister for "unclean" Sudras and
lower castes, including the makers and dealers in spirituous liquors; as
well as those who officiate at the great public shrines or places of
pilgrimage where they might be liable to accept forbidden gifts, and, as
a matter of fact, often amass considerable wealth; and those who
officiate as paid priests at cremations and funeral rites, when the
wearing apparel and bedding of the deceased are not unfrequently claimed
by them as their perquisites.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account