_Decimal or Briggian Antilogarithms._--In the ordinary tables of
logarithms the natural numbers are all integers, while the logarithms
tabulated are incommensurable. In an antilogarithmic table, the
logarithms are exact quantities such as .00001, .00002, &c., and the
numbers are incommensurable. The earliest and largest table of this
kind that has been constructed is Dodson's _Antilogarithmic canon_
(1742), which gives the numbers to 11 places, corresponding to the
logarithms from .00001 to .99999 at intervals of .00001.
Antilogarithmic tables are few in number, the only other extensive
tables of the same kind that have been published occurring in
Shortrede's _Logarithmic tables_ already referred to, and in
Filipowski's _Table of antilogarithms_ (1849). Both are similar to
Dodson's tables, from which they were derived, but they only give
numbers to 7 places.
_Hyperbolic or Napierian logarithms_ (i.e. to base e).--The most
elaborate table of hyperbolic logarithms that exists is due to
Wolfram, a Dutch lieutenant of artillery. His table gives the
logarithms of all numbers up to 2200, and of primes (and also of a
great many composite numbers) from 2200 to 10,009, to 48 decimal
places. The table appeared in Schulze's _Neue und erweiterte Sammlung
logarithmischer Tafeln_ (1778), and was reprinted in Vega's
_Thesaurus_ (1794), already referred to. Six logarithms omitted in
Schulze's work, and which Wolfram had been prevented from computing by
a serious illness, were published subsequently, and the table as given
by Vega is complete. The largest hyperbolic table as regards range was
published by Zacharias Dase at Vienna in 1850 under the title _Tafel
der natürlichen Logarithmen der Zahlen_.
_Hyperbolic antilogarithms_ are simple exponentials, i.e. the
hyperbolic antilogarithm of x is e^x. Such tables can scarcely be said
to come under the head of logarithmic tables. See TABLES,
MATHEMATICAL: _Exponential Functions_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account