Ending the depression through planned obsolescenceLondon, Bernard
General
Ending the depression through planned obsolescence
London, Bernard
Economic policy; United States -- Economic conditions -- 1918-1945
For example, a consumer purchasing a $100 radio, on which the sales tax
is 10 per cent or $10, the purchaser would pay cash for the radio, but
could offer $10 worth of receipts for obsolete merchandise turned in,
in payment of the sales tax. The merchant or manufacturer would have to
accept these receipts for this purpose, and would turn them back to the
Government in payment of the sales tax, which must be borne ultimately
by the consumer in any event.
Under this system, the purchaser would feel he had been paid for
the used-up article which he turned in to the Government, yet the
Government would not have had to pay a cent of cash for the goods so
surrendered. As a result of the process, nevertheless, the wheels of
industry would be greased, and factories would be kept busy supplying
new goods, while employment would be maintained at a higher level.
I maintain that taxes should be levied on the people who are retarding
progress and preventing business from functioning normally, rather than
as at present on those who are cooperating and promoting progress.
Therefore I propose that when a person continues to possess and use
old clothing, automobiles and buildings, after they have passed their
obsolescence date, as determined at the time they were created, he
should be taxed for such continued use of what is legally “dead.” He
could not deny that he does not possess such goods, as he might hide
his income to avoid paying an income tax, because they are material
things, with their date of manufacture known. Today we penalize by
taxation persons who spend their money to purchase commodities, which
are necessary in order to create business. Would it not be far more
desirable to tax instead the man who is hoarding his money and keeping
old and useless things? We should tax the man who holds old things for
a longer time than originally allotted.
Under the present estate and inheritance tax system, the State has
to wait an indefinite period, and allow the owner of a building or
commodity to keep on earning and adding more to his fortune until he
dies, before it can collect its inheritance tax. With obsolescence of
merchandise computed in advance, the Government will collect when the
article dies, instead of when its owner dies.
Moreover, the present method of collecting revenue under the income
tax is speculative and uncertain, because the profits of industry and
business, upon which the income tax is based, are subject to vast
fluctuations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account