Europe -- Politics and government -- 1815-1848; France -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain
A few hours later Bulwer returned to Auteuil. Before leaving M. Thiers
he had told him that he would like him to see the account of their
conversation which he proposed to send to London. The despatch which
he, accordingly, placed in his hands began by stating that, in the
writer's opinion, the moment had come when M. Thiers purposed saying
to the King, "You must follow me even to war, or I will leave you
exposed to public opinion as expressed by the newspapers." It was
certain, however, that the King would not accept such a programme,
and that, were M. Thiers to place his resignation on those grounds,
it would be unhesitatingly accepted. This was very far from the kind
of message which Thiers wished conveyed to Lord Palmerston. "My dear
Bulwer," he said, "you are greatly mistaken, you will ruin your
promising career. The King is far more warlike than I am."[613] Bulwer
saw no occasion to argue that point, and, having produced the desired
effect, he readily agreed merely to relate to his chief the substance
of their morning's conversation. In a private and confidential
despatch, however, he stated that this interview had left a strong
impression upon his mind that M. Thiers had, in reality, an earnest
desire to maintain peace.[614]
These so-called concessions of Mehemet Ali were, Lord Palmerston
declared, unworthy of serious consideration. Whether Syria were
governed by Ibrahim or by Mehemet Ali was a matter of very little
importance. The object with which the treaty had been concluded must
be relentlessly pursued. Syria must be replaced under the direct rule
of the Porte. Until the Egyptian desert should intervene between the
territories of the Sultan and those administered by his too-powerful
vassal, there could be no permanent peace in the East. No arguments of
M. Guizot could induce him to adopt a less uncompromising attitude.
The Pasha's proposals indicated, he maintained, that he already
perceived the necessity of bowing to the inevitable, and that he
would, before long, yield to all the demands of the Powers.[615]
Certain of his colleagues, however, altogether dissented from this
view of the case. Mehemet Ali's concessions, they contended, had
created an opportunity for terminating the differences with France and
for drawing her into the negotiations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account