Transcriber’s Note: Sidenotes have been moved to immediately before the footnote to which they refer. English Law and the Renaissance London: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE, AND STEVENS AND SONS, LTD, 119 AND 120, CHANCERY LANE. [Illustration] Glasgow: 50, WELLINGTON STREET. Leipzig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. New York: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Bombay: E. SEYMOUR HALE. [_All Rights reserved._] English Law and the Renaissance (_The Rede Lecture for 1901_) with some Notes by Frederic William Maitland, LL.D., Hon. D.C.L., of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law, Downing Professor of the Laws of England in the University of Cambridge CAMBRIDGE at the University Press 1901 Cambridge: PRINTED BY J. AND C. F. CLAY, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN TO JAMES BRADLEY THAYER, LL.D. PROFESSOR OF LAW AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY. ENGLISH LAW AND THE RENAISSANCE. _Mr Vice-Chancellor and Fellow-Students_: Were we to recall to life the good Sir Robert Rede who endowed lecturers in this university, we might reasonably hope that he would approve and admire the fruit that in these last years has been borne by his liberality. And then, as in private duty or private interest bound, I would have him speak thus: ‘Yes, it is marvellous and more than marvellous this triumph of the sciences that my modest rent-charge stimulates you annually to record; nor do I wonder less at what my lecturers have said of humane letters and the fine arts, of the history of all times and of my time, of Erasmus whom I remember, and that age of the Renaissance (as you call it) in which (so you say) I lived. But there is one matter, one science (for such we accounted it) of which they seem to have said little or nothing; and it happens to be a matter, a science, in which I used to take some interest and which I endeavoured to teach. You have not, I hope, forgotten that I was not only an English judge, but, what is more, a reader in English law[1].’