English Surnames: Their Sources and SignificationsBardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
History
English Surnames: Their Sources and Significations
Bardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
Names, English; Names, Personal -- English
homeliness, ‘Sparrow;’ if tenderness, ‘Pigeon’ or ‘Dove,’ and so on with
our ‘Swans,’ ‘Herons,’ ‘Cootes,’ ‘Gulls,’ ‘Storks,’ ‘Ravens,’ ‘Crows,’
‘Speights,’ ‘Cranes,’ ‘Capons,’ ‘Henns,’ ‘Chickens,’[585] ‘Ducks,’
‘Duckerells,’ ‘Drakes,’ ‘Sheldrakes’ or ‘Sheldricks,’ ‘Wildgooses,’
‘Mallards’ (_i.e._ wild duck), ‘Gooses’ or ‘Goss’s,’[586] ‘Greygooses,’
‘Goslings,’[587] ‘Ganders,’ ‘Woodcocks,’ ‘Partridges,’ ‘Partricks,’
‘Pheasants,’ or ‘Fesants,’ as once spelt, and ‘Blackbirds.’[588] These
are names ornithologically familiar to us. Many a pretty name, however,
once on the common tongue but now obsolete, or well-nigh so, still
abides in our surnames. Thus our ‘Popjays’ still preserve the
remembrance of the once common _popinjay_ or parrot, ‘the popinjay, full
of delicasy,’ as Chaucer styles her.[589] In ‘Culver’ or ringdove we are
reminded of the pathetic story of Philomine, where the same writer
likens her to
the lamb that of the wolf is bitten,
Or as the culver, that of the eagle is smitten.[590]
Our ‘Ruddocks’ or ‘Ruddicks’ (‘Ralph Ruddoc,’ A.), again, are but the
old _ruddock_ or robin-redbreast, ‘the tame ruddock,’ as he is termed in
the ‘Assembly of Fowls.’ The hedge-sparrow still lives represented by
our ‘Pinnocks’ or ‘Pinnicks’ ‘John Pynnock’ (G.), ‘Richard Pinnoc’ (A.)—
Thus in the pinnick’s nest the cuckoo lays,
Then, easy as a Frenchman, takes her flight.
So an old writer says. Our ‘Turtles’ (‘Roger Turtle’ D.) are but
pleasant memorials of the bird that has been so long emblematic of
constancy, the dove; our ‘Challenders,’ if not a corruption of
‘Callender,’ are representatives of the _chelaunder_ or goldfinch, so
often mentioned by early poets; and in our ‘Woodalls,’ ‘Woodales,’ and
‘Woodwalls,’ not to say some of our ‘Woodwells,’ we are but reminded of
the _woodwale_, the early woodpecker. Our ‘Rains’ are but the old
‘Robert or William le Rain,’ another term for the same;[591] while our
‘Stars’ and ‘Stares’ (‘Robert Stare,’ A.) carry us back to the day when
the starling was so familiarly styled. In the ‘Assembly of Fowls’ the
author speaks of—
The false lapwing, full of trecherie,
The _stare_, that the counsaile can beurie.
In the ‘Romance of the Rose’ a list of birds is given embracing many of
the above—
For there was many a bird singing,
Throughout the yard all thringing,
In many places were nightingales,
Alpes, finches, and wodewales,
That in their sweet song delighten,
In thilke (such) places as they habiten.
There might men see many flocks
of turtles, and laverocks,
Chelaundres fele (many) saw I there,
That very nigh forsongen were (tired of singing).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account