English Surnames: Their Sources and SignificationsBardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
History
English Surnames: Their Sources and Significations
Bardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
Names, English; Names, Personal -- English
Every one of these birds so styled is still to be met with in our
directories, for even the _alpe_ or bull-finch is not absent. It is only
in the investigation of subjects like this we see how great are the
changes that creep over a people’s language. What a list of words is
this, which if uttered now would fall dead and meaningless upon the ear
of the listener, and yet they were once familiar as household words.
(_c_) _Fish._—‘John le Fysche’ or ‘William Fyske’ have left descendants
enough to prove that many a Fish can live out of water, although much
has been advanced to the contrary. At a time when the peasants lived
daily on the products of the inland streams and sandy sea-banks, and
when the supply was infinitely more plentiful than it is now, we can
easily perceive the naturalness of the sobriquets that belong to this
class. Terms that are all but obsolete to us now, were household words
then. Hence it is that we find our directories of to-day abounding with
such entries as ‘Whale,’[592] ‘Shark,’ ‘Dolphin,’ Herring,’[593]
‘Codde,’ ‘Codling,’ ‘Salmon,’[594] ‘Trout,’ ‘Mackarel,’ ‘Grayling,’
‘Smelt,’ ‘Pilchard,’ ‘Whiting,’ ‘Turbot,’[595] ‘Keeling,’ ‘Crabbe,’
‘Chubb,’[596] ‘Tench,’[597] ‘Pike,’ and ‘Pickerel.’ ‘John Sturgeon’ is
mentioned by Foxe in his ‘Martyrology,’ under date 1541, and still
remains. The Hundred Rolls contain a ‘William Lampreye.’ ‘Barnacle’ is
still common, and ‘Mussell’ and ‘Spratt’[598] are not unknown. But
perhaps the most curious of these early nicknames are those belonging to
‘Matilda le Welke’ and ‘William Welkeshorn.’ Probably they were
notorious for a weakness towards that mollusk, which is still eaten in
large quantities in some parts of England.
(_d_) _Insects and Reptiles._—This is not a large class. The Hundred
Rolls furnish us with a ‘Magge Flie’ and an ‘Oda[599] Flie.’ The same
records contain a ‘Margaret Gnatte’ and a ‘William Gnatte.’ ‘Baldewin
Bugg’ (B.) and ‘Bate Bugge’ (A.) are also found, but although the
question has been asked—
If a party had a voice,
What mortal would be a Bugg by choice,
I fancy the cognomen is local, one of the endless forms, like ‘Brough,’
‘Burgh,’ ‘Burkes,’ of the old ‘Borough.’ ‘Roger le Waps’[600] reminds us
of the still existing provincialism for wasp, and ‘William Snake’ or
‘John Frog’ would be as little acceptable.[601] The smallest and most
repulsive insect we have, the parasitic louse, is found in ‘Nicholas le
Lus’ (J.), but our directories have now got rid of it—an example that
might be followed with no small advantage in other quarters.
(2) _Descriptive Compounds affixed as Nicknames._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account