English Surnames: Their Sources and SignificationsBardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
History
English Surnames: Their Sources and Significations
Bardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
Names, English; Names, Personal -- English
It must have been this connexion which made ‘Tony’ the common sobriquet
for a simpleton or a country clown. It lived in this sense till Dryden’s
day, and certainly had become such so early as the thirteenth century,
if we may judge by the occurrence of such names as ‘Ida le Tony,’ or
‘Roger le Tony,’ found in the Rolls of that period.[41] If, however, St.
Anthony was thus doomed to be an example, how great may be the drawbacks
to saintly distinction: ‘St. Cuthbert,’ who, in the odour of sanctity,
dwelt at Lindisfarne, may even be more pitied, for, owing to the
familiarity of his name in every rustic household of Northumbria and
Durham, he became as ‘Cuddie,’ a sobriquet for the donkey, and is thus
known and associated to the present moment. Our ‘Cuthberts,’
‘Cuthbertsons,’ and ‘Cutbeards,’ however, need trouble themselves
little, I imagine, on the question of their connection with the animal
to whom we usually ascribe the honours in regard to obstinacy and
stubbornness. Our ‘Cuddies,’ perhaps, are not quite so free from
suspicion. Our ‘Cobbets’ undoubtedly spring from ‘Cuthbert.’ A ‘Nicholas
Cowbeytson’ occurs in a Yorkshire register of the fourteenth century
(Fabric Rolls of York Minster: Sur. Soc.). From ‘Cowbeyt’ to ‘Cobbet’ is
a natural—I might say an inevitable—change. This name, however, owes
nothing to the Normans. Not so ‘Giles.’ Everyone knows the story of St.
Giles, how he dwelt as an anchorite in the forest near Nismes, and was
discovered by the King because the hind, which daily gave him milk,
pushed in the chase, fled to his feet. The name is entered in our rolls
alike as ‘Giles,’ ‘Gile,’ and ‘Egedius’ (Gile Deacon. A. Jordan fil.
Egidius, A). St. Lawrence, put on a gridiron over a slow fire in the
third century, made his name popular in Spain. An archbishop of
Canterbury, raised to a saintship in the seventh century, made the same
familiar in England. Besides ‘Lawson,’ we have ‘Larkins’ and ‘Larson.’
In the lines already quoted relative to Wat Tyler’s insurrection, it is
said—
_Larkin_ et in medio, non minor esse putat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account