Evasion was more difficult in the case of the larger animals, for the
magistrates could not wink at all the pretended suicides of pigs,
sheep, and cattle that were brought before them. Sometimes they had to
convict, and a few convictions had a very terrorising effect—whereas in
the case of animals killed by a dog, the marks of the dog’s teeth could
be seen, and it was practically impossible to prove malice on the part
of the owner of the dog.
Another fertile source of disobedience to the law was furnished by a
decision of one of the judges that raised a great outcry among the more
fervent disciples of the old prophet. The judge held that it was lawful
to kill any animal in self-defence, and that such conduct was so
natural on the part of a man who found himself attacked, that the
attacking creature should be held to have died a natural death. The
High Vegetarians had indeed good reason to be alarmed, for hardly had
this decision become generally known before a number of animals,
hitherto harmless, took to attacking their owners with such ferocity,
that it became necessary to put them to a natural death. Again, it was
quite common at that time to see the carcase of a calf, lamb, or kid
exposed for sale with a label from the inspector certifying that it had
been killed in self-defence. Sometimes even the carcase of a lamb or
calf was exposed as “warranted still-born,” when it presented every
appearance of having enjoyed at least a month of life.
As for the flesh of animals that had _bona fide_ died a natural death,
the permission to eat it was nugatory, for it was generally eaten by
some other animal before man got hold of it; or failing this it was
often poisonous, so that practically people were forced to evade the
law by some of the means above spoken of, or to become vegetarians.
This last alternative was so little to the taste of the Erewhonians,
that the laws against killing animals were falling into desuetude, and
would very likely have been repealed, but for the breaking out of a
pestilence, which was ascribed by the priests and prophets of the day
to the lawlessness of the people in the matter of eating forbidden
flesh. On this, there was a reaction; stringent laws were passed,
forbidding the use of meat in any form or shape, and permitting no food
but grain, fruits, and vegetables to be sold in shops and markets.
These laws were enacted about two hundred years after the death of the
old prophet who had first unsettled people’s minds about the rights of
animals; but they had hardly been passed before people again began to
break them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account