Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His SonButler, Samuel
Philosophy
Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son
Butler, Samuel
Satire; Utopian fiction; Utopias -- Fiction
I cannot say whether or no Professor Panky was really deceived by the
sweet effrontery with which my father proffered him the bone. If he was
taken in, his answer was dictated simply by a donnish unwillingness to
allow any one to be better informed on any subject than he was himself.
My father, when I suggested this to him, would not hear of it. “Oh no,”
he said; “the man knew well enough that I was lying.” However this may
be, the Professor’s manner changed.
“You are right,” he said, “I thought they were landrail bones, but was
not sure till I had one in my hand. I see, too, that the plucked birds
are landrails, but there is little light, and I have not often seen
them without their feathers.”
“I think,” said my father to me, “that Hanky knew what his friend
meant, for he said, ‘Panky, I am very hungry.’”
“Oh, Hanky, Hanky,” said the other, modulating his harsh voice till it
was quite pleasant. “Don’t corrupt the poor man.”
“Panky, drop that; we are not at Bridgeford now; I am very hungry, and
I believe half those birds are not quails but landrails.”
My father saw he was safe. He said, “Perhaps some of them might prove
to be so, sir, under certain circumstances. I am a poor man, sir.”
“Come, come,” said Hanky; and he slipped a sum equal to about
half-a-crown into my father’s hand.
“I do not know what you mean, sir,” said my father, “and if I did,
half-a- crown would not be nearly enough.”
“Hanky,” said Panky, “you must get this fellow to give you lessons.”
CHAPTER IV: MY FATHER OVERHEARS MORE OF HANKY AND PANKY’S CONVERSATION
My father, schooled under adversity, knew that it was never well to
press advantage too far. He took the equivalent of five shillings for
three brace, which was somewhat less than the birds would have been
worth when things were as he had known them. Moreover, he consented
to take a shilling’s worth of Musical Bank money, which (as he has
explained in his book) has no appreciable value outside these banks.
He did this because he knew that it would be respectable to be seen
carrying a little Musical Bank money, and also because he wished to
give some of it to the British Museum, where he knew that this curious
coinage was unrepresented. But the coins struck him as being much
thinner and smaller than he had remembered them.
It was Panky, not Hanky, who had given him the Musical Bank money.
Panky was the greater humbug of the two, for he would humbug even
himself--a thing, by the way, not very hard to do; and yet he was
the less successful humbug, for he could humbug no one who was worth
humbugging--not for long. Hanky’s occasional frankness put people
off their guard. He was the mere common, superficial, perfunctory
Professor, who, being a Professor, would of course profess, but would
not lie more than was in the bond; he was log-rolled and log-rolling,
but still, in a robust wolfish fashion, human.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account