Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Religion
Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.
Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Idols and images -- Worship; Mythology; Religions
We have reason to believe that the Britons inhabited England not long
after the days of Noah. We might therefore expect to find resemblances
between their religion and the religions of other ancient peoples; and
we are not disappointed. There is a striking correspondence between the
system of the ancient Britons and those of the Hebrew patriarchs, the
Brahmins of India, the Magi of Persia and the Greek priests. It was
one system that was finally conveyed to these different parts of the
globe. Take, as a single instance of the many points of comparison,
their idea of God. Among their names for the supreme God which they
had in use before the introduction of Christianity were terms which
have been literally translated, “God,” “Distributor,” “Governor,”
“the Mysterious One,” “the Eternal,” “He that pervadeth all things,”
“the Author of Existence,” “the Ancient of Days.” These expressive
appellations sufficiently indicate their views of the moral character
and attributes of God. The opinion of the Druids as to the nature of
God is comprehensively explained by the following bold and remarkable
aphorism: “Nid Dim Ond Duw, Nid Duw Ond Dim.” It defies translation so
as to convey its force and beauty; but William Owen has furnished a
version sufficiently plain to convey the idea: “God cannot be matter;
what is not matter must be God.” These were the attributes of the God
of the early Druids. They believed that the Deity was the source of
life, and the giver of good. They defined His duration as eternal,
and ascribed to Him omnipotence as the measure of His power. And as
they found nothing in the animal creation or in man which had any
proportion or resemblance to God, they had neither statues nor pictures
to represent Him; from which we infer that they regarded God as a pure
spirit, as disengaged from matter as He was exalted above all created
things and above all resemblance to them.
WORSHIP OF THE DRUIDS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account