English essays -- 18th century; Fiction; Short stories
Were not I supported by so great an authority as that of Mr. Dryden, I
should not venture to observe that the taste of most of our English
poets, as well as readers, is extremely Gothic. He quotes Monsieur
Segrais for a threefold distinction of the readers of poetry; in the
first of which he comprehends the rabble of readers, whom he does not
treat as such with regard to their quality, but to their numbers and the
coarseness of their taste. His words are as follows: "Segrais has
distinguished the readers of poetry, according to their capacity of
judging, into three classes." [He might have said the same of writers
too if he had pleased.] "In the lowest form he places those whom he
calls Les Petits Esprits, such things as our upper-gallery audience in a
playhouse, who like nothing but the husk and rind of wit, and prefer a
quibble, a conceit, an epigram, before solid sense and elegant
expression. These are mob readers. If Virgil and Martial stood for
Parliament-men, we know already who would carry it. But though they made
the greatest appearance in the field, and cried the loudest, the best of
it is they are but a sort of French Huguenots, or Dutch boors, brought
over in herds, but not naturalised: who have not lands of two pounds per
annum in Parnassus, and therefore are not privileged to poll. Their
authors are of the same level, fit to represent them on a mountebank's
stage, or to be masters of the ceremonies in a bear-garden; yet these are
they who have the most admirers. But it often happens, to their
mortification, that as their readers improve their stock of sense, as
they may by reading better books, and by conversation with men of
judgment, they soon forsake them."
I must not dismiss this subject without observing that, as Mr. Locke, in
the passage above-mentioned, has discovered the most fruitful source of
wit, so there is another of a quite contrary nature to it, which does
likewise branch itself into several kinds. For not only the resemblance,
but the opposition of ideas does very often produce wit, as I could show
in several little points, turns, and antitheses that I may possibly
enlarge upon in some future speculation.
Sixth Paper.
_Humano capiti cervicem pictor equinam_
_Jungere si velit_, _et varias inducere plumas_,
_Undique collatis membris_, _ut turpiter atrum_
_Desinat in piscem mulier formosa superne_;
_Spectatum admissi risum teneatis_, _amici_?
_Credite_, _Pisones_, _isti tabulae_, _fore librum_
_Persimilem_, _cujus_, _velut aegri somnia_, _vanae_
_Fingentur species_.
HOR., _Ars Poet._ 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account