There appears to be a considerable difference between the earliest age
at which it is physiologically desirable that a woman should marry and
that at which the ablest, or at least the most cultured, women usually
do. Acceleration in the time of marriage, often amounting to 7 years, as
from 28 or 29 to 21 or 22, under influences such as those mentioned
above, is by no means improbable. What would be its effect on
productivity? It might be expected to act in two ways:—
(1) By shortening each generation by an amount roughly proportionate to
the diminution in age at which marriage occurs. Suppose the span of each
generation to be shortened by one-sixth, so that six take the place of
five, and that the productivity of each marriage is unaltered, it
follows that one-sixth more children will be brought into the world
during the same time, which is, roughly equivalent to increasing the
productivity of an unshortened generation by that amount.
(2) By saving from certain barrenness the earlier part of the
child-bearing period of the woman. Authorities differ so much as to the
direct gain of fertility due to early marriage that it is dangerous to
express an opinion. The large and thriving families that I have known
were the offspring of mothers who married very young.
The next influence to be considered is that of healthy homes. These and
a simple life certainly conduce to fertility. They also act indirectly
by preserving lives that would otherwise fail to reach adult age. It is
not necessarily the weakest who perish in this way, for instance,
zymotic disease falls indiscriminately on the weak and the strong.
Again, the children would be healthier and therefore more likely in
their turn to become parents of a healthy stock. The great danger to
high civilisations, and remarkably so to our own, is the exhaustive
drain upon the rural districts to supply large towns. Those who come up
to the towns may produce large families, but there is much reason to
believe that these dwindle away in subsequent generations. In short, the
towns sterilise rural vigour.
As one of the reasons for choosing the selected class would be that of
hereditary fertility, it follows that the selected class would respond
more than other classes to the above influences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account