Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XXXII. In opposition to this, some may reply, that the tenets of Zeno and
the Stoics, who place all happiness in the practice of virtue, should be
preferred to those of Epicurus. To which I answer, that this doctrine
has a fine sound, but that it is false and ridiculous in the fundamental
parts of it. I firmly believe, that the Stoics were the least sincere
of all the ancient philosophers. A great critic of recent date, very
humorously and properly called them the Pharisees of Paganism. The name
of virtue was ever in their mouths, and the virtue they preached up, was
of the most austere kind; but notwithstanding this, they in fact were as
solicitous to promote their own temporal interests and convenience, as
the most worldly of mankind. Seneca, that bright pattern of, and esteemed
honour to the Stoic school, at the same time that he rolled in riches,
and was living in the highest stile of pomp, and with the greatest
profusion of luxury, to say nothing of his usury, vociferated loudly in
favour of poverty; which strongly evinces, that the Stoics, without the
exception of even Seneca himself, were hypocrites, who did not believe it
was possible for any one to practise, the very virtue they had preached
up. They would have had a learned and a wise man, arrive at being an
insensible one; who while he was suffering the greatest torments, should
appear cheerful and serene; and that he should seem no more affected with
all the vexations that can be given him by mankind, than the sun seems
to be, with the arrows that are discharged against Heaven; or, than the
gods are with the blows that are given to their statues. Both the one and
the other of these similies, are made use of by Seneca; from whence, it
may evidently be inferred, that the virtue he recommended, was not only
an ideal, but a chimerical one. The behaviour of Dionysius of Heraclea,
shews very plainly, the extravagance of the Stoic philosophy. This
philosopher, was for a long while a disciple and a sectary of Zeno’s,
during all which time, he enjoyed a good state of health; but became
afterwards afflicted with a severe disorder in his eyes, or as some say,
in his kidneys; and indeed Cicero mentions them both: and finding that it
was impossible under these afflictions, for him to enjoy that calmness
and serenity of mind, which was so much recommended by Zeno, he abandoned
his master’s school, and gave himself up to all sorts of debauchery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account