Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LVIII. The proper name of this hero, is not Tamerlan, but Timurbec; for
thus he was called by his own subjects; and this is the name by which the
Persian writers call him. It is true, that some of the Oriental authors
call him Timur-lenk; and so Monsieur Herbelot calls him; but others are
of opinion, that this last name was affixed to him as a term of reproach
by the Turks, who changed the termination _bec_, which signifies prince,
into the word _lenk_, which signifies lame; which was done, either
because the Turks really thought he was so, or because they feigned him
to have been so; or else, the cause of his lameness, was a fiction of
their raising, as we shall presently make appear probable. The describing
him by the name of Timur-lenk, having been introduced into Europe, it
soon became corrupted there into Tamerlan, or Tamorlan, and has been
generally made use of by all the European writers, for it is but a few
years ago, that we learned from the Oriental authors, his true name. But
as calling him either by one name or another, is a matter of little
importance, we shall make use of the name which has been most generally
adopted, as by that he will be best known.
LIX. Tamerlan, without doubt, was one of the most famous conquerors the
world ever knew, and deserving to be ranked among the catalogue of the
greatest heroes, with the Alexanders and the Cæsars. It may be, that
circumstances made the victories of Alexander and Cæsar more remarkable
than his; but it is certain, that neither the one nor the other of
them, obtained so many as Tamerlan. There is not a single author, who
does not acknowledge the great number of his triumphs and victories,
and they also unanimously confess, that he was possessed of all the
endowments necessary for obtaining them; so that we should not look
upon his conquering so many countries, and preserving them after he had
acquired them, as owing to a lucky assemblage of fortunate events; or
as a gratuitous bequest of fortune; but as a tribute due to his valour,
and military and political conduct. But the virtues of the conqueror,
have been so blackened with the savage actions of the barbarian, that we
have lost the image of the man in the colouring of his picture; because
we only find in his character, as it has been drawn by some historians,
representations in the extreme, of the hero and the brute; and, in order
that his origin should bear proportion with his behaviour, they have made
him the son of a poor shepherd, who soon forsaking the occupation of his
father, became the leader of a gang of thieves; and by increasing his
infamous band to the size of an army, found himself in a condition to
plunder kingdoms, and dethrone princes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account