Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LX. As the account of all these particulars came to Europe immediately
from Turkey, which is a country, where they detest every thing belonging
to Persia, there is no doubt to be made, but all, or nearly all, the
Turks have said to blacken the character of Tamerlan, was an invention
of their own; who, besides the general hatred they bear to the Persians,
view with a particular envious eye, the prince, who above all others, has
humbled the Ottoman pride. To detect the imposture of these relations,
I shall have recourse to those Persian authors, whom Monsieur Herbelot
quotes in his Bibliotheca Orientalis, and the extract from it of the
History of Tamerlan, which is inserted in the Memoirs of Trevoux,
translated from the Persian by Monsieur Petit Lacroix.
LXI. In the first place, what is said of his mean extraction, is false;
for the Oriental authors, which Messieurs Herbelot and Petit Lacroix
quote, describe him as a person most nobly born, and of kingly descent.
Cheref Eddin Ali, who is the author Monsieur Petit Lacroix translated,
says, that his father was a sovereign prince in a part of Transoxana,
and that his territories were in Scythia or Asiatic Tartary; also, that
upon Tamerlan’s succeeding to the sovereignty, he married the sister of
Hussein, king of Transoxana.
LXII. Proceeding from the birth of Tamerlan, to treat of his customs
and manners, I must premise, that I don’t pretend to represent him as
having all the accomplishments of a perfect hero; but those would swerve
as far from the truth, who were to paint him as an infernal fury, and a
barbarian, destitute of all humanity and good faith; and as one, whose
whole behaviour proclaimed, that he was actuated by no other motives,
than those of brutal pride, savage cruelty, and blind rage. Tamerlan,
without doubt, was extremely ambitious; and this was his ruling vice.
But how much more virtuous than him in this particular, were those, who
have been celebrated as consummate heroes, by the unanimous consent of
ages? And what is more, it was the vice of ambition which gained them the
reputation of heroes. If Alexander had not been unboundedly ambitious,
he would never have acquired more applause in the world, than many of
the other kings of Macedonia. Cæsar, without ambition, might have been
equally a great captain; but, divested of his ambition, would never have
made so much eclat in the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account