Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
III. My good Sir, in investigating this point, we shall find there are
two distinct things to be considered, and that the consequences to be
deduced from them, are by no means reciprocal or the same. One of them
is, whether Bacon was the first who formed the project of discrediting
all systems; and the other is, whether he was the first who undertook to
attack Aristotle. I affirm that he took the lead in attacking all systems
in general; but not that he was the first who attacked the doctrines of
Aristotle. Indeed I could not assert this last circumstance, without
falling not only into a gross error, but into a manifest contradiction of
myself; for in the fourth volume of the Theatrico Critico, I have said,
that not only Bernardinus Telesius, preceded Bacon, in the attempt of
combating Aristotle; but I also pointed out many others, who had preceded
him in the same attempt; and instanced Gemistus, Plethon, Cardinal
Bessarion, Franciscus Patricius, Theophrastus Paracelsus, together with
Peter del Ramo.
IV. I also declared in the same place, after making mention of
Paracelsus, that Bernardinus Telesius (nearly at the same time with him)
who was a native of the city of Cosenza in the kingdom of Naples, and
a man of subtle ingenuity, declared himself averse to the physics of
Aristotle; and endeavoured to establish the system of his own, upon the
principles, which, with a little variation, were afterwards adopted by
Campænela.
V. I there also, in express words, declared, that Bacon was posterior
to Telesius in his attack upon the doctrines of Aristotle, as may be
seen by the order in which I ranged Aristotle’s impugners; for after
mentioning the philosopher Cosentinus, and many others of them, I
proceeded to speak of Bacon, which I did in the following words; _After
these came that great and sublime genius Francis Bacon, earl of Verulam,
&c._ and you will please to observe, that the words after these, as they
stand in the context, clearly imply, that Bacon was not only posterior to
Telesius, but to all the others; both with respect to the time in which
he lived, and also in his attack upon Aristotle. By all this you may see
clearly, that I can make no objection to your well-grounded assertion,
that as Telesius was considerably anterior to Bacon, he could borrow no
lights from Bacon’s works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account