Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
XCVIII. To this it may be urged by way of objection, in the first place,
that in order to perceive and be convinced of the turpitude of those
actions, there is no necessity for a man to be possessed of a bright
understanding, as a middling one, or even one below the middle class,
would be sufficient for this purpose; so that this reasoning will prove
the turpitude to be plain to every understanding, high, middling, and
low, or else that it is evident to neither of them.
XCIX. To this I answer, that although the thing may be known with intire
certainty to every one of them, there is a great difference between
the knowledge and comprehension of one man, and that of another. Two
understandings that are unequal, notwithstanding they may both know, and
be thoroughly persuaded of the same truth, may be struck with it very
differently; and in proportion as one of these understandings is the most
clear, that one will know it more distinctly, more strikingly, and with
a more refined degree of penetration; and in proportion as the other
is less clear, that other will perceive it less distinctly, and more
confusedly. In consequence of this inequality of understandings, objects
make a more strong or a more weak impression on the soul, and have more
or less influence to excite in it, these, or those affections. The same
infinite goodness of God which is known to the blessed, is known with
infallible certainty by the worldly also. How then comes it to pass, that
the first love him necessarily and intensely, and that we worldly mortals
are so luke-warm in our love of him? This is occasioned by no other
cause than the following, that although our knowledge of him is evident,
that of the blessed is the most clear, and ours the most obscure; and
in proportion as the understanding knows a good or an evil with greater
clearness, the will is moved with a greater impetus, to love the first,
and abhor the last.
C. This may be very opportunely and aptly explained, by the operation of
any corporeal sense; for he whose olfactory nerves are very quick, will
be more offended with an ill smell, than one in whom that sensation is
more languid and remiss; and although this last may be able clearly to
distinguish the ill smell, he will be less disgusted at it; nor will it
appear so hateful to him; and this happens from no other reason, than
that the olfactory perception of the first is very clear, and that of the
second rather obstructed or more dull; and although not only the man who
has a very quick and delicate ear, but also he who has one that is more
obtuse, may evidently perceive the dissonance of three or four voices
which are totally discordant; the last will bear it without being much
affected, and the other will be almost distracted by it; and this is all
derived from the cause above-mentioned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account