Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
VII. Nor is saying that in the absence of the sun, the earth is the agent
that cools the air any reply to this; for if this was so, the lower
region of the air would be colder than the middle one, as being nearer to
the infrigidating cause; but this is contradicted by our experience; for
we very commonly see, that the water does not freeze in the lower region,
when in the middle one it is frozen into hail in the clouds; and very
often also, that which was frozen above, thaws suddenly upon its falling
down.
VIII. If it should be objected to this, that Aristotle and the
Peripatetics, when they say the air is warm, speak of the elemental air,
and not of the air of the atmosphere which is mixed with an infinite
number of heterogenous corpuscles, by some of which it may be made cold,
and especially by the many nitrous ones with which it is impregnated. To
this I answer first, that in the country where I am now writing, there is
not the least appearance of the air being nitrous, for that there is not
a grain of nitre to be found in the whole country, notwithstanding which,
the cold in winter is sometimes pretty sharp. I answer secondly, that
we can only talk of the pure elemental air by conjecture, for no mortal
has yet ever breathed any of it, nor is it possible that any one ever
should, on account of this element being an open expanse, exposed to the
inroads of the effluvias of all other bodies; and we should reason upon
sensible qualities, by pursuing the thread of palpable experiments; and
not by pursuing that of ideal proportions, as Aristotle did in making
the division of his elemental qualities; for the Author of nature is not
confined to pursuing only such proportions as fall within the compass
of our comprehension. This is the false principle, upon which all the
Pythagorean and Aristotelic philosophy has proceeded, and with respect
to the doctrine of the four elements, that seems to be tainted with the
same vice, as I shall shew more fully in another place. All that I shall
say at present is, that Aristotle dealt out, and distributed the four
qualities among the four elements, as if he had been the absolute master
of them all, and could dispose of and arrange them agreeable to his will
and pleasure.
PARADOX III.
_Water considered according to its Nature, is rather disposed to be
solid, than fluid._
SECT. III.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account