Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish — John Shaqi
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
IX. This may be demonstrated, upon the same principle the antecedent
paradox was; remove for any length of time, the interposition of any
extrinsic agent that may contribute to warm the water, and it will always
be found to be solid, that is, in a frozen state. This then being so, we
may conclude, that is the state it is disposed to continue in agreeable
to its nature. This is evinced by the sea under the Poles, and in the
adjacent parts, being, during the whole six months the sun is absent
from them, frozen to such a degree, that after the sun has revisited
them, and continued its influence for the other six months, it is never
totally thawed; and it is for this reason, that it has always been found
impracticable to sail to China by that rout.
X. The water being under this influence, is a proof _ad hominem_, that it
cannot, agreeable to the doctrine of Aristotle, be cold in the highest
degree, for if that was the case it must ever continue in a frozen state;
so that we can only say, that by its nature it is most disposed to
solidity.
XI. Frozen water being easily made liquid by a moderate heat, is no proof
that it is not naturally inclined to solidity. Metals may be liquified
by an intense heat, but that does not shew that they are not of a solid
nature; and a thing being more easily, or with more difficulty dissolved,
makes no difference with respect to this mode of reasoning; and therefore
the water being made liquid with a less intense heat, than is found
necessary to liquify metals, does not prove, that it is not disposed in
its nature to be solid as well as them.
PARADOX IV.
_Either all Qualities are occult, or none of them are so._
SECT. IV.
XII. The school philosophers call all those qualities occult, which are
not reckoned among the four elemental ones, and which do not result
from the various combinations of these elemental ones, because they
suppose their operations move in a line superior to those which may
be supposed to proceed from humidity, dryness, cold, heat, hardness,
softness, colour, favour, &c. And although it is true, that some by
pursuing the system of assigning second qualities, which result from the
various combinations of the first; or third qualities, resulting from the
various combinations of the second; and among these third, have placed
the wonderful virtues of the load-stone, the operation of purges, and
others of those which they call occult, and which by these means they
have attempted to reduce to manifest ones; this mode of proceeding, has
been abandoned by the generality of philosophers, and with reason; for
it is very clear, that combine, and recombine, the qualities of humidity,
dryness, heat, and cold, in what way you will, you will not be able to
find out, that they are capable of directing the load-stone to the Pole,
or of causing it to attract iron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account