"The greatest happiness of all those whose interest is in question
is the right and proper, and the only right and proper and
_universally desirable_ end of human action." Mill says, "To do as
you would be done by, and to love your neighbor as yourself,
constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality." And
again: "The happiness which is the Utilitarian standard of what is
right in conduct is not the agent's own happiness, but that of all
concerned; as between his own happiness and that of others,
Utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a
disinterested and benevolent spectator." So Sidgwick (_Methods of
Ethics_, p. 379): "By Utilitarianism is here meant the ethical
theory, first distinctly formulated by Bentham, that the conduct
which under any given circumstances is externally or objectively
right is that which produces the greatest amount of happiness _on
the whole_; that is taking into account all whose happiness is
affected by the conduct. It would tend to clearness if we might
call this principle, and the method based upon it, by some such
name as Universalistic hedonism." And finally, Bain (_Emotions and
Will_, p. 303): "Utility is opposed to the selfish principle, for,
as propounded, it always implies the good of society generally and
the subordination of individual interests to the general good."
=Social Purpose of Utilitarianism.=--Its aim, then, was the "greatest
possible happiness of the greatest possible number," a democratic,
fraternal aim. In the computation of the elements of this aim, it
insisted upon the principle of social and moral equality: "every one to
count for one, and only for one." The standard was the well-being of the
community conceived as a community of individuals, all of whom had equal
rights and none of whom had special privileges or exclusive avenues of
access to happiness. In a period in which the democratic spirit in
England was asserting itself against vested interests and
class-distinctions, against legalized inequalities of all sorts, the
utilitarian philosophy became the natural and perhaps indispensable
adjunct of the liberal and reforming spirit in law, education, and
politics. Every custom, every institution, was cross-questioned; it was
not allowed to plead precedent and prior existence as a basis for
continued existence. It had to prove that it conduced to the happiness
of the community as a whole, or be legislated out of existence or into
reform. Bentham's fundamental objection to other types of moral theories
than his own was not so much philosophic or theoretic as it was
practical. He felt that every intuitional theory tended to dignify
prejudice, convention, and fixed customs, and so to consecrate vested
interests and inequitable institutions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account