Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
"We are all going back to preventatives," said another. "After all it
is the foundation of Mosaic law--the prevention of evil. America has
adopted the idea. Prohibition is not freedom. It is taking the bottle
away and not giving you a chance. It is the same with other human
sins. The best way to reduce the numbers of murders is to reduce the
number of weapons and exact a heavy gun licence. The best way to stop
robbery is to use more steel locks. Make it difficult to commit crime
and then crime won't be committed. But beware of Freedom."
The conversation was side-tracked on to the subject of the "dryness of
America." But it provided an insight into the German point of view.
Coming into line with the rest of Europe Germany accepted the idea of
Freedom in November, 1918. She watched how it worked and then very
quickly turned her back on it. In truth, Freedom is not congenial to
Germans. Had Germany won she hoped to impose her type of civilization
everywhere, and she saw little harm in the fact of imposition.
Inferior nations ought to be raised to Germany's cultural level by
force, and they ought to be prevented from running amuck
internationally, also by force. The German mind viewed complacently
the bondage of the small nations in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It
did not think that Czechs or Poles lost anything by being governed from
Vienna. Its only reservation was that it might be still better for
them if they were governed from Berlin. Berlin still believes that
Alsatians and Danes and Poles and Russians and Czechs are better in
health under German discipline. Europe organized militarily was the
German conception of the future--that some one should order and some
one should obey everywhere.
Great Britain caught the idea through Carlyle, though it was more
congenial to the Germanic type of Southern Scot than to English or
Irish. We talked of "captains of industry," and the "aristocracy of
talent," and "benevolent autocracy," though we could not realize them.
But to modern Germany this idea was society's cement. It was preached
from the Lutheran pulpit, it was taught by sergeants in the Army, it
was unfolded and beflagged by politicians on election day. There were
rebels against it but no national movement opposed it. It was even
rooted in the home where husband ruled wife, and father ruled children
with complete authority, and a man could point to his _frau_ or his
_kind_ with his index finger, and say "To-morrow you will do that. Now
you shall do this!"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account