Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave tradeRamsay, James
Religion
Examination of the Rev. Mr. Harris's scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade
Ramsay, James
Harris, R. (Raymund). Scriptural researches on the licitness of the slave trade; Slave trade -- Early works to 1800
This gentleman professes to treat the subject seriously, and to
submit his opinion to the decisions of revealed religion. No man has
a right to dispute his sincerity, as far as his own way of thinking
is concerned; but few serious people will peruse his extraordinary
positions, without having their reverence for their Creator shocked,
and their benevolence to their brother affected. The Scriptures,
from which he draws his conclusions, we believe to teach, that all
men are equally dear to their Creator, and that we owe love and good
offices to each other. But if his deductions be fairly made, we must
no longer entertain this opinion; for one part of mankind is to
be kidnapped, evil intreated, oppressed, murdered, to indulge the
avarice of another; and, page 76, Corol. 3d. “He doth not believe the
Scriptures, who is not persuaded that this doctrine is taught there.”
But the author stumbles at the very threshold. Our Saviour (John v.
39.) bids the Jews to search the scriptures; “for in them ye think
ye have eternal life; for they are they which testify of me,” the
Saviour come to free men from the bondage of sin, into the glorious
privilege of the sons of God. But it seems something else is meant.
We are to search the scriptures (see title page) for a commission
to Leverpool captains for fitting out ships, and loading them with
powder, shot, and cutlasses, to set the Africans on to assault,
kidnap, and enslave each other; to be transferred over to them; to
be murdered by bad air, thirst, and famine, in the passage to the
West-Indies; where the poor remains are to be set to hard labour,
without food, without cloathing, without rest, sufficient to support
nature.
It is true (preface, page 5.) he, with all the other advocates for
slavery, declares himself “an enemy to injustice and oppression.”
But the design of his book is to shew, that the ill-treatment of
slaves is not an object of divine animadversion; for (p. 16.) Sarah
was permitted without censure, “to use cruel oppressive treatment
to Hagar;” and (p. 26.) Joseph is approved of by God for the
cruel manner in which he enslaved and exchanged the abodes of the
Egyptians. Which of these is to be believed; his general assertion,
or his particular application? Or may we conclude, that he reserves
to himself the feelings of humanity, and sells tyranny and oppression
to his friends of Leverpool.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account