Experiments of Spiritual Life & Health, and Their Preservatives: In Which the Weakest Child of God May Get Assurance of His Spirituall Life and Blessednesse Etc.Williams, Roger
Religion
Experiments of Spiritual Life & Health, and Their Preservatives: In Which the Weakest Child of God May Get Assurance of His Spirituall Life and Blessednesse Etc.
Williams, Roger
Christian life
[Sidenote: _Tenthly._]
[Sidenote: The true watch of Gods people over their Tongue.]
Tenthly, It is an _Argument_ of strength and vigour of _grace_, to keep
a constant _watch_ and _bridle_ on our _lips_ and _tongue_, that no
words passe but such as are seasoned with _Salt_, to the _glorifying_
of our _Maker_ with our _glory_, and the _edifying_ or _benefiting_ of
others. This _Tongue_ of ours the _Lord_ compares to the _bridle_ of
a _Horse_, to the _Helm_ of a _Ship_, which if well managed rules the
_horse_ and _ship_, with _safety_ and _comfort_: and the _Spirit_ of
_God_ concludes; that he is a _perfect_ and _strong_ man in _Christ_,
that is thus able to command his _Speech_ and _Tongue_ in this world.
Hence _Christ Jesus_ preacheth _Judgement_ to the _world_, for the
_abuse_ of the _Tongue_, and the _idle words_ of it, when our _words_
are not _working words_, and tend not to heavenly profiting of others.
Hence the _Spirit_ by _Paul_ commands (_Ephes. 5_.) that neither
_uncleannesse_, nor _covetousnesse_, nor _foolish talking_, nor
_jeasting_, be once heard from the mouths of the _Saints_, but rather
giving of _thanks_, and praising of _God_.
_Object._ But may not _worldly_ persons set a watch before the door of
their _lips_?
_I answer, Morall wisdome_ may teach persons the _vanity_ and grosse
_wickednesse_ of the _Tongue_, but onely _Gods spirit_ (and strength of
it) doth teach _Gods children_, in true _feare_ and _love_ of _God_,
not onely to _restraine_ from _vaine_ and _foolish_, but also to
attaine to a _spirituall_ and _heavenly Language_.
Lastly, It argues strength and life and _Grace_ in _Christ_, when our
_hearts_ by _Gods spirit_ are wrought to such a degree of _hatred_ of
sin, that we not onely abhor the _acts_ thereof, but also fly and shun
the _looks_ and _appearance_ of it; so that we not only fly _pride_
and _passion_, and _covetousnesse_ and _uncleannesse_, but also the
_appearance_ of them.
Hence _Boaz_, when _Ruth_ lay downe at his feet in the night,
as claiming _marriage_ by _right_, he not only refrained from
_uncleannesse_, or uncleane _touches_, but also he gravely advised her
to be gone so early in the morning, that no man should say there came a
woman into the floar.
_Object._ But may not _worldly_ persons not only avoid sin, but also
the _appearance_ of it?
[Sidenote: Only Gods children can truly hate sin.]
_I answer_, No _worldly_ or _unregenerate person_ can truly hate _sin_,
or the appearance of it, for it is his _nature_ and _Element_, they can
onely hate the _dammages_ and _disgrace_, and _discredit_ of it, and
so a _Whore_ may hate _whoredome_. 'Tis only the _property_ of _Gods_
children, and the _new-borne_ to hate _sin_ as _sin_, with the sinfull
_appearances_ of it as _opposite_ to their _new_ and _heavenly_ nature
in _Jesus Christ_.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account