Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
So far we might say that simple people do not like simple things. This
is certainly true if we compare the classic with these highly coloured
things of mediævalism, or all the vivid visions which first began to
glow in the night of the Dark Ages. Now one of these things was the
romantic expedient called rhyme. And even in this, if we compare the
two, we shall see something of the same paradox by which the simple like
complexities and the complex like simplicities. The ignorant liked rich
carvings and melodious and often ingenious rhymes. The learned liked
bare walls and blank verse. But in the case of rhyme it is peculiarly
difficult to define the double and yet very definite truth. It is
difficult to define the sense in which rhyme is artificial and the sense
in which it is simple. In truth it is simple because it is artificial.
It is an artifice of the kind enjoyed by children and other poetic
people; it is a toy. As a technical accomplishment it stands at the same
distance from the popular experience as the old popular sports. Like
swimming, like dancing, like drawing the bow, anybody can do it, but
nobody can do it without taking the trouble to do it; and only a few can
do it very well. In a hundred ways it was akin to that simple and even
humble energy that made all the lost glory of the guilds. Thus their
rhyme was useful as well as ornamental. It was not merely a melody but
also a mnemonic; just as their towers were not merely trophies but
beacons and belfries. In another aspect rhyme is akin to rhetoric, but
of a very positive and emphatic sort: the coincidence of sound giving
the effect of saying, “It is certainly so.” Shakespeare realized this
when he rounded off a fierce or romantic scene with a rhymed couplet. I
know that some critics do not like this, but I think there is a moment
when a drama ought to become a melodrama. Then there is a much older
effect of rhyme that can only be called mystical, which may seem the
very opposite of the utilitarian, and almost equally remote from the
rhetorical. Yet it shares with the former the tough texture of something
not easily forgotten, and with the latter the touch of authority which
is the aim of all oratory. The thing I mean may be found in the fact
that so many of the old proverbial prophecies, from Merlin to Mother
Shipton, were handed down in rhyme. It can be found in the very name of
Thomas the Rhymer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account