Fancies Versus FadsChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Fancies Versus Fads
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
English essays -- 20th century
Free love is the direct enemy of freedom. It is the most obvious of all
the bribes that can be offered by slavery. In servile societies a vast
amount of sexual laxity can go on in practice, and even in theory, save
when now and then some cranky speculator or crazy squire has a fad for
some special breed of slaves like a breed of cattle. And even that
lunacy would not last long; for lunatics are the minority among
slave-owners. Slavery has a much more sane and a much more subtle appeal
to human nature than that. It is much more likely that, after a few such
fads and freaks, the new Servile State would settle down into the sleepy
resignation of the old Servile State; the old pagan repose in slavery,
as it was before Christianity came to trouble and perplex the world with
ideals of liberty and chivalry. One of the conveniences of that pagan
world is that, below a certain level of society, nobody really need
bother about pedigree or paternity at all. A new world began when slaves
began to stand on their dignity as virgin martyrs. Christendom is the
civilization that such martyrs made; and slavery is its returning enemy.
But of all the bribes that the old pagan slavery can offer, this luxury
and laxity is the strongest; nor do I deny that the influences desiring
the degradation of human dignity have here chosen their instrument
well.
Street Cries and Stretching the Law
About a hundred years ago some enemy sowed among our people the heresy
that it is more practical to use a corkscrew to open a sardine-tin, or
to employ a door-scraper as a paperweight. Practical politics came to
mean the habit of using everything for some other purpose than its own;
of snatching up anything as a substitute for something else. A law that
had been meant to do one thing, and had conspicuously failed to do it,
was always excused because it might do something totally different and
perhaps directly contrary. A custom that was supposed to keep everything
white was allowed to survive on condition that it made everything black.
In reality this is so far from being practical that it does not even
rise to the dignity of being lazy. At the best it can only claim to save
trouble, and it does not even do that. What it really means is that some
people will take every other kind of trouble in the world, if they are
saved the trouble of thinking. They will sit for hours trying to open a
tin with a corkscrew, rather than make the mental effort of pursuing the
abstract, academic, logical connexion between a corkscrew and a cork.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account