Feudal England: Historical Studies on the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries — John Shaqi
Feudal England: Historical Studies on the Eleventh and Twelfth CenturiesRound, John Horace
History
Feudal England: Historical Studies on the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries
Round, John Horace
Domesday book; Feudalism -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; Normans -- Great Britain
Similar to its evidence on the Domesday 'plough' is that which the
I.C.C. affords as to the hide and virgate. In my criticism of Mr
Pell's learned paper, I strenuously opposed his view that the _hida_
of Domesday was composed of a variable number of virgates, and I
insisted on the fact that the Domesday 'virgate' was essentially
and always the _quarter_ of the geldable 'hide'.[71] The following
parallel passages will amply prove the fact:
_I.C.C._ _D.B._
fo. 102 (_a_) 1: i. hidam et i. hidam et iii. virgatas terræ.--
dimidiam et unam virgam. i. 194 (_a_) 2.
fo. 102 (_a_) 1: dimidiam ii. virg' et dimidiam--i. 194
hidam et dimidiam virg'. (_a_) 2.
fo. 103 (_a_) 1: dimidiam ii.^{as} virg' et dimidiam--i. 198
hidam et dimidiam virg'. (_a_) 2.
fo. 103 (_b_) 1: i. hida et i. hida et ii. virg' et dimidiam--
dimidia et dimidia virg'. i. 190 (_a_) 2.
fo. 103 (_b_) 2: i. hida et i. hida et iii. virg'--i. 198
dimidia et i. virg'. (_b_) 1.
fo. 106 (_b_) 2: iiii. hidæ iv. hidæ et iii. virg'--i. 200
et dimidia et una virg'. (_b_) 1.
fo. 112 (_a_) 2: xi. hidæ i. x. hidæ et iii. virg--i. 192
virg' minus. (_b_) 1.
These are only some of the passages of _direct_ glossarial value.[72]
Indirectly, that is to say by analysis of the township assessments,
we obtain the same result throughout the survey _passim_.[73] Here,
again, we are able to assert that two virgates must have been to the
scribes as obviously equivalent to half a hide as ten shillings with
us are equivalent to half a sovereign. For here, again, the point is
that these scribes had no knowledge of the varying circumstances of
each locality. They had nothing to guide them but the return itself,
so that the rule, in Domesday, of 'four virgates to a hide' must have
been of universal application.
But not only were there thus, in Domesday, four virgates to a hide;
there were also in the Domesday virgate thirty Domesday acres. Mr
Eyton, though perhaps unrivalled in the study he has bestowed on the
subject, believed that there were only twelve such acres, of which,
therefore, forty-eight composed the Domesday hide.[74] It is, perhaps,
the most important information to be derived from the I.C.C. that _a
hundred and twenty_ Domesday acres composed the Domesday hide.[75]
We have the following direct statements:
_I.C.C._ _D.B._
fo. 105 (_b_) 2: 'una virg' i. 202 (_b_) 1: 'In dominio
et x. acre in dominio'. dimidia hida xx. acras minus.'
fo. iii. (_a_) 1: 'tenet i. 193 (_b_) 1: 'tenet comes
Rogerus comes xx. acras.' ii. partes unius virg'.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account