Spores were borne in long cylindrical cones at the tips of the branches.
Those cones referred, or assigned, to the genus _Lepidostrobus_ bore
both small spores (microspores) and large spores (megaspores) in the
same cones. Those in which only a large single spore, a somewhat
seedlike structure, was developed in a spore sac (sporangium) are
referred to the genus _Lepidocarpon_.
The rather commonly found genus _Stigmaria_ comprises so-called
“appendages” which, although stemlike in structure, apparently served as
roots for the scale and seal trees. These appendages are identified by
irregular spirals of circular scars (pits) that mark the attachment
points of former rootlets.
[Illustration: Reconstruction of _Sigillaria_
(after Hirmer)]
_Sigillaria_, although less common than _Lepidodendron_, was widely
distributed during the Pennsylvanian Period. It differed in growth habit
from _Lepidodendron_ in that it generally had fewer branches and not
uncommonly was unbranched. Some species also possessed a thicker trunk,
with hexagonal to elongate leaf cushions separated by vertical ribs. The
trunk was crowned, in the manner of the modern palm tree, by a cluster
of large, grasslike leaves.
The detached leaves of _Sigillaria_, extremely difficult to distinguish
from _Lepidophyllum_ (leaves of _Lepidodendron_), are referred to the
genus _Sigillariophyllum_ if preserved as compressions and to
_Sigillariopsis_ if preserved as petrifactions. Unbranched _Sigillaria_
trunks have been found that are more than 100 feet long and six feet in
diameter near the base, but the average height probably was closer to 50
feet.
[Illustration: Reconstruction of _Calamites_
(After Hirmer)]
Not all Pennsylvanian trees were large, however. Small forms are known,
including the important undergrowth genera _Lycopodites_ and
_Selaginellites_. In woody types the trunk consisted of an inner region
of conducting and supporting tissues, surrounding concentric cortical
layers, and an outer layer of corklike bark. Although the fossil
impressions of the various bark layers have been given separate generic
names, these are not commonly used.
SCOURING RUSHES
(Plate 2)
Although related to the small, inconspicuous horsetails of today, the
ancient scouring rushes of the Pennsylvanian Period grew to the size of
trees and were among the most widely distributed plant groups.
Some of these plants attained heights of 40 feet or more, but the
average was closer to 20 feet. The trunks were jointed and bore a whorl
of branches at the joints (nodes). Their small leaves also grew in
whorls at nodes along the smaller branches. Internodal regions were
ribbed in the same manner as present day horsetails. Fossils of the
trunks are assigned to the genus _Calamites_ and quite commonly are
preserved in sandstone and shale.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account