Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1 — John Shaqi
Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1Lahee, Charles
History
Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1
Lahee, Charles
Chelsea (London, England) -- History -- 19th century; Chelsea (London, England) -- Politics and government
“There was some discussion as to the propriety of making the
requirements of this clause compulsory instead of merely permissive.
After the fullest consideration however, it was thought essential,
with the view of avoiding discussions in vestries, and especially
with the view of counteracting the underhand and secret influence
which the gas companies exert in many vestries and district boards,
to make the clause compulsory. There are many instances on record,
where powers are given to local authorities, and yet these powers,
although highly important to the public interests, have never
hitherto been exercised. Hence an additional reason for positively
requiring them to provide apparatus, &c., for testing the gas, and to
appoint and pay an inspector for the purpose. It is true that no
time is fixed within which the apparatus is to be provided and the
inspector appointed, but I apprehend it will be competent for any
ratepayer to compel, by mandamus, the performance of this duty by any
vestry or district board, within a reasonable time.
“The second section of the clause imposes an obligation on the gas
companies—namely, that each of them shall within six months erect at
the prescribed distance from their works, an experimental meter and
other apparatus for testing the illuminating power of the gas.
“Now these two obligations, the one on the local authorities of the
metropolis, and the other on the gas companies, must not be
confounded, because they are perfectly distinct, and the one is not
to be a substitute for the other. In the first place each local
authority in the metropolis—_i.e._, each vestry and district board,
about thirty-eight in number, constituted under the Metropolis Local
Management Act, is to erect its own apparatus, and appoint its own
inspector; and from future clauses it appears that the act
contemplates a continuous and regular succession of testing by this
inspector, both for purity and illuminating power. The evidence of
this inspector however as to any defects in the gas, will not be
conclusive until his report has been confirmed by testing the gas at
the prescribed distance of 1000 yards from the works. Hence the
necessity for the obligation on the company. The next clause will
better explain the mode of proceeding by the inspector, whenever he
finds the gas to be below the prescribed standard of illuminating
power. With reference to purity there is nothing about testing for
this at the distance of 1000 yards, and therefore the test for this
may be made wherever the inspector pleases.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account