Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1Lahee, Charles
History
Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1
Lahee, Charles
Chelsea (London, England) -- History -- 19th century; Chelsea (London, England) -- Politics and government
“With respect to the number of separate places for testing the gas,
inasmuch as there are thirteen companies included within the act, and
each must provide a testing house 1000 yards distant from their
works, there must evidently be not less than thirteen of these. {9}
But if each local authority also erects a separate one at some
central part of its district, thirty-eight of these will be
necessary. A power is afterwards given for two or more local
authorities to combine, and then the number will probably be somewhat
diminished.
“All this necessity for a duplicate set of testing establishments is
rendered essential by the absurd requirement of the act as to testing
the gas at 1000 yards distance from the works. Now as the erection
of this apparatus by the companies and the establishment of a
permanent testing place away from their works will be very expensive
to the companies, it is just possible they may be very glad to be
relieved from this expense, and may consent to the testing at the
establishment of the local authority being sufficient evidence of the
illuminating power as well as the purity of the gas. This is the
more probable as it must be perfectly well known to the companies—at
least to their engineers—that so far as the company is concerned the
gas may just as well be tested in the centre of any district
supplied, as at the limited distance of 1000 yards from the works.”
Under the provisions of the fiftieth section of this act, the duty is
imposed upon the Metropolitan Board of Works of raising the costs and
charges incident to its passing; and that board have accordingly levied
under their precepts upon the several vestries and district boards, the
necessary amounts for meeting the claims received.
The accounts sent in by the various parties were submitted to the proper
officer of the House of Commons for taxation with the following result:—
Accounts sent in. Amount Certified by Costs Allowed. Board to Pay.
Taxing Officer.
£ _s._ _d._ £ _s._ _d._ £ _s._ _d._ £ _s._ _d._
Mr. Dangerfield 89 19 6 62 6 0 3 11 8 65 17 8
Mr. Wyatt 3666 0 4 3033 18 10 None. 3033 18 10
Mr. Beal . . . £2685 13 6 1272 13 6 676 11 7 None. 676 11 7
Less paid by Mr. Wyatt .
. . 1413 0 0
5022 13 4
House Fees on Taxation to be paid by Dyson & Co., (as Parliamentary Agents) 42 0 0
3818 8 1
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account