Well that's where I always felt Foe could help. And yet he didn't
help very much. He read a heap of poetry--on the sly, as it were;
and one night I coaxed him off to a talk about Browning.
His language on the way home was three-parts blasphemy.
Am I making him at all clear to you? He kept his intellect in a cage
all to itself, so to speak. . . . What's more--and you'll see the
point of this by and by--he liked to keep his few friends in separate
cages. I won't say he was jealous: but if he liked A and B, it was
odds he'd be uneasy at A's liking B, or at any rate getting to like
him intimately.
This secretiveness had its value, to be sure. It gave you a sense of
being _privileged_ by his friendship. . . . Or, no; that's too
priggish for my meaning. Foe wasn't a bit of a prig. It was only
because he had, on his record already, so much brains that the
ordinary man who met him in my rooms was disposed to wonder how he
could be so good a fellow. Get into your minds, please, that he
_was_ a good fellow, and that no one doubted it; of the sort that
listens and doesn't speak out of his turn.
He had a great capacity for silence; and it's queer to me--since I've
thought over it--what a large share of our friendship consisted in
just sitting up into the small hours and smoking, and saying next to
nothing. _I_ talked, no doubt: Foe didn't.
I shall go on calling him Foe. He was Jack to me, always; but Foe
suits better with the story; and besides . . . well, I suppose
there's always something in friendship that one chooses to keep in a
cage. . . . The only cage-mate that Jack--I mean Foe--ever allowed me
was Jimmy Caldecott, and that happened after we had both moved to
London.
He--Foe--had taken a first-class in the Tripos, of course; and a
fellowship on top of that. But he did not stay up at Cambridge.
He put in the next few years at different London hospitals, published
some papers on the nervous system of animals, got appointed Professor
of Animal Morphology, in the South London University College (the
Silversmiths' College), and might wake up any morning to find himself
a Fellow of the Royal Society. He was already--I am talking of 1907,
when the tale starts--a Corresponding Member of three or four learned
Societies in Europe and the U.S.A., and had put a couple of honorary
doctorates to his account besides his Cambridge DSc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account