Food and Morals: 6th EditionClymer, J. F. (John F.)
Religion
Food and Morals: 6th Edition
Clymer, J. F. (John F.)
Food; Sermons, American -- 19th century
Basing its work upon exact science, and being presided over by a
scientific man, it has gained the support and co-operation of the
scientific world. A year or two since, a competitor in the manufacture
of a single article, known as “Whole Wheat Flour,” secured the
publication of an article from the pen of a Dr. Ephraim Cutter—styling
himself “a microscopist”—in which he asserted his ability to determine
the relative percentages of gluten and starch by the use of the
microscope alone. He furthermore said that while the food-value of
a bread-flour depended upon its percentage of gluten, the various
flours of the Health Food Company contained no gluten whatever; and
that the flour made by the “Franklin Mills” (Dr. Cutter’s employer)
was so rich in gluten as to make it “a blessing to mankind.” These
grossly absurd statements called forth some very scathing criticisms
and much ridicule by the medical and secular press, and induced Prof.
R. H. Thurston, of the Stevens Institute of Technology—who had derived
benefit from the Health Foods—to invite his colleague, Prof. Albert
N. Leeds, Public Analyst for the State of New Jersey and Professor of
Chemistry in the Stevens Institute, to microscopically examine and
chemically analyze the food substances alluded to, for the purpose of
determining the accuracy or inaccuracy of Cutter’s statements, and,
furthermore, to settle the question of the value of the “microscopic
analysis,” for which so much had been claimed by Cutter. Prof. Leeds’
careful work conclusively showed that the microscope was _valuable to
detect adulterations_, but valueless as a means of determining the
percentages of the various natural constituents of a cereal flour;
so he proceeded to apply the crucial test of chemical analysis, with
striking results. (In our limited space we can only briefly quote from
the Professor’s published statement, but we are assured that he will
cheerfully mail a copy of the pamphlet to any one who shall address
him at the College named, situated in Hoboken, New Jersey.) Premising
that wheat in its natural state contains, on the average, about 12
per cent. of albuminoids—chiefly gluten—he found in the Health Food
Company’s Whole Wheat Flour 16.74 per cent. of this substance. Of the
“Franklin Mills” flour, said to be made from “entire wheat,” he writes:
“It contains 8.55 per cent. of albuminoids, chiefly gluten, together
with a very large percentage of cellulose or finely-ground bran. It is
greatly lacking in nutritive elements.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account