The blue canopic jar shown in the frontispiece and the top of another, a
hawk’s head, represented in the above line engraving, were, after
prolonged bargaining, bought for 7_s._ and 6_s._ each. The seller, an
up-river man, took a most solemn oath that they were old, but that the
glaze was new. When I pinned him down to definite statements, he
explained to me that he meant that the earth of which they were composed
was old; which of course is true, but that is not the sense in which the
ordinary buyer would understand it. With this reservation he would feel
himself at liberty to take the most solemn oaths that, with the
exception of the glaze, his specimens were really old.
As I have said, the forgers are now also in the habit of melting the old
glass fragments and pieces of glaze, and using it to recolour their
productions.
In some of the antiquity shops in Luxor there may be seen cases
containing admitted imitations of ancient pottery ware. The prices asked
for these imitations are from £l 10_s._ to £3 each. When I pointed out
to the dealer that this was a stiff price to pay for what was an
admitted forgery, he indignantly denied any intention of fraud, and
declared that these objects were artistic in design and execution, and
well worth the money he asked for them. One cannot help feeling,
however, that should an unwary tourist or an ignorant collector arrive
on the scene, it is possible that he might become the possessor of one
of these porcelain objects without having any idea that it was not a
genuine antiquity.
[Illustration: PLATE X. PORCELAIN, WOOD AND GLASS. 1. Bottle with two
handles. 2. Wooden jar with handle. 3, 7 & 8. Vases made of composition
and coloured. 4. A glass figure made to represent Lapis Lazuli. 5. Blue
bowl. 6. Blue vase.]
On Plate XII are shown some very beautiful objects. No. 3 is a winged
scarab, which represented the sun crossing the heavens from east to west
within a day. It is a fine piece of work, but is made of plaster of
Paris and painted.
No. 2 shows a lotus cup, well designed, copied from the original, and
made of soft composition, but spoilt in the firing. This, however, gives
the effect of age. It is beautifully coloured, and the date is about the
eighteenth dynasty. By the side of it is a lotus bowl (No. 1) made by
the same maker. These are really charming objects of interest, and are
very cleverly made; the shape, however, is not quite right. Large sums
of money were asked for them, but they were purchased for a few
shillings each at the end of the season, when the up-river men were
anxious to go home to their villages, and did not want to take back any
unsold goods with them on their long journey, preferring during the
summer to make fresh objects for the next season.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account