Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
Harry is a good boy, and does as he is bid; but nothing whatever is
said in the letter about not getting out of the carriage to walk up
hills. And at ‘two-mile hill’ Harry thinks it will be clever to get out
and walk up it, without calling to, or stopping, John on the box. Once
out himself, he gets Mary out;—the children begin snowballing each
other; the carriage leaves them so far behind that they can’t catch it;
a snowstorm comes on, etc., etc.; they are pathetically frozen within a
breath of their lives; found by a benevolent carter, just in time;
warmed by a benevolent farmer, the carter’s friend; restored to their
alarmed father and mother; and Mary has a rheumatic fever, “and for a
whole week it was not known whether she would live or die,” which is
the Providential punishment of Harry’s sin in getting out of the
carriage.
Admitting the perfect appositeness and justice of this Providential
punishment; I am, parenthetically, desirous to know of my Evangelical
friends, first, whether from the corruption of Harry’s nature they
could have expected anything better than his stealthily getting out of
the carriage to walk up the hill?—and, secondly, whether the merits of
Christ, which are enough to save any murderer or swindler from all the
disagreeable consequences of murder and swindling, in the next world,
are not enough in this world, if properly relied upon, to save a wicked
little boy’s sister from rheumatic fever? This, I say, I only ask
parenthetically, for my own information; my immediate business being to
ask what effect this story is intended to produce on my shepherd’s
little daughter Agnes?
Intended to produce, I say: what effect it does produce, I can easily
ascertain; but what do the writer and the learned editor expect of it?
Or rather, to touch the very beginning of the inquiry, for what class
of child do they intend it? ‘For all classes,’ the enlightened editor
and liberal publisher doubtless reply. ‘Classes, indeed! In the
glorious liberty of the Future, there shall be none!’
Well, be it so; but in the inglorious slavery of the Past, it has
happened that my little Agnes’s father has not kept a carriage; that
Agnes herself has not often seen one, is not likely often to be in one,
and has seen a great deal too much snow, and had a great deal too much
walking in it, to be tempted out,—if she ever has the chance of being
driven in a carriage to a children’s party at seven,—to walk up a hill
on the road. Such is our benighted life in Westmoreland. In the future,
do my pious and liberal friends suppose that all little Agneses are to
drive in carriages? That is their Utopia. Mine, so much abused for its
impossibility, is only that a good many little Agneses who at present
drive in carriages, shall have none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account