Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.Carvalho, David Nunes
History
Forty Centuries of Ink: Or, A chronological narrative concerning ink and its backgrounds, introducing incidental observations and deductions, parallels of time and color phenomena, bibliography, chemistry, poetical effusions, citations, anecdotes and curiosa together with some evidence respecting the evanescent character of most inks of to-day and an epitome of chemico-legal ink.
Carvalho, David Nunes
Ink
"Valuable information is often obtainable by
treating writing or other ink-marks with reagents.
Some inks are affected much more rapidly than
others, though the rate of change depends greatly
on the age of the writing. Normal oxalic acid (63
grammes per litre), or hydrochloric acid of
corresponding strength, should be applied to a part of
the ink marked with a feather or camel-hair brush
(or the writing may be traced over with a quill
pen), and the action observed by means of a lens,
the reagent being allowed to dry on the paper.
Recent writing (one or two days old) in gallic inks
is changed by one application of oxalic acid to a
light gray, or by hydrochloric acid to yellow.
Older stains resist longer, in proportion to their
age, and a deeper color remains. Log-wood ink
marks are mostly reddened by oxalic acid, and
alizarin marks become bluish, but aniline inks
are unaffected. With hydrochloric acid, logwood
ink marks turn reddish or reddish-gray, alizarin
marks greenish, and aniline ink marks reddish or
brownish-gray. The treatment with acid should
be followed by exposure to ammonia vapors, or
blotting paper wet with ammonia may be applied.
Thus treated, marks in logwood ink turn dark
violet or violet-black. The age of ink marks very
greatly affects the rate of their fading when treated
with dilute ammonia, the old marks being more
refractory. The behavior of ink marks when
treated with solution of bleaching powder is often
characteristic, the older writings resisting longer;
but unless the reagent be extremely dilute, writings
of all ages are removed almost simultaneously.
Hydrogen peroxide acts more slowly than bleaching
solution, but gives more definite results. After
bleaching the mark by either reagent, the iron of
the ink remains mordanted on the paper, and the
mark may be restored by treatment with a dilute
solution of galls, tannic acid, or acidulated ferro-
cyanide. The same reagents may be used for restoring
writing which has been faded from age
alone.
"When ink marks have been erased or discharged
by chemical means, traces of the treatment
are often recognizable. After effecting the erasure
the spot is often rubbed over with a powdered alum
or gum sandarac, or coated with gelatin or size.
The bleaching agents most likely to have been
used are oxalic, citric, or hydrochloric acid, bleaching
powder solution, or acid sulphite of sodium.
Moistened litmus paper will indicate the presence
of a free acid, and in some cases treatment with
ammonia fumes will restore the color. The presence
of calcium, chlorides, or sulphates in the
water in which the paper is soaked will afford some
indication of bleaching powder or a sulphite having
been used. Potassium ferro-cyanide will detect
any iron remaining in the paper. Exposure to
iodine vapor often affords evidence of chemical
treatment, and other methods of examination
readily suggest themselves."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account